shape
carat
color
clarity

Help Picking a Diamond

mike0983

Rough_Rock
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
38
Hi All,

It's me again...After spending another weekend seeing stones in person I decided to up the budget. My GF is easy going, she just wants big and sparkly (not color sensitive), but I am finding that combination to be quite tricky lol

These are my final selections…I know it’s a bit all over the place but I tried to find the best stones across a wide price range in the H/I and VS1/VS2. I welcome your thoughts!!!

Personally I’m leaning towards the 2.11…

1.70 H-VS1:

2.11 I-VS1:

2.01 I-VS1

1.71 H-VS2
 
Hi All,

It's me again...After spending another weekend seeing stones in person I decided to up the budget. My GF is easy going, she just wants big and sparkly (not color sensitive), but I am finding that combination to be quite tricky lol

These are my final selections…I know it’s a bit all over the place but I tried to find the best stones across a wide price range in the H/I and VS1/VS2. I welcome your thoughts!!!

Personally I’m leaning towards the 2.11…

1.70 H-VS1:

2.11 I-VS1:

2.01 I-VS1

1.71 H-VS2

I also lean towards the 1.7 and the Victor Canera.
 
My least favorite is the 2.11

I like the one 1.7 and of course 1.71 from VC.

But for less $$ you can get this

I'm looking at the Aset for the VC stone...i'm a total rookie, but it doesn't look great around the pavillion. I could be wrong and would appreciate your feedback
 
My least favorite is the 2.11

I like the one 1.7 and of course 1.71 from VC.

But for less $$ you can get this

@Kim N for comparison and learning sake: would you still recommend that WF ACA you linked above (that has more obvious inclusions) instead of this WF Expert Selection that has similar size and stats but with less obvious inclusions (and for even less $$!). If so, or if not, what would the reasons be?

 
@Kim N for comparison and learning sake: would you still recommend that WF ACA you linked above (that has more obvious inclusions) instead of this WF Expert Selection that has similar size and stats but with less obvious inclusions (and for even less $$!). If so, or if not, what would the reasons be?


Did you mean this for me? The post you quoted is lovedogs's. :))
 
Did you mean this for me? The post you quoted is lovedogs's. :))

from what i can tell the expert selection isn't eye clean... sorry to hi-jack the response! :)
 
Neither was the ACA, was it?

whiteflash says it's eye-clean, but tbh I am skeptical from the video and aseet reading
 
whiteflash says it's eye-clean, but tbh I am skeptical from the video and aseet reading

You can ask WF to take an IRL pic to judge for yourself. I believe their definition of eye clean is "clean at 10 inch viewing distance"
 
I just learned that there's an "eye-clean" parameter in the WF description areas. I never actually looked in detail at those! , Thanks @mike0983
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top