How to Read This Scope Image?

[checkoutthehook]

Hi again everyone. I just got this scope image of a diamond that I am considering. Cut is super ideal, but I don’t know how to read this image. Any thoughts? Thanks so much!

 

[free-user]

Looks slightly tilted and the actual shot is not shot in macro. With that being said its does not appear to be a good performer. Good luck

 

[tyty333]

I wouldnt trust this image (just doesnt look like it was taken well).

What makes you think it has a super ideal cut?

 

[checkoutthehook]

Hi tyty333. Based on these cut proportions that I posted a couple of days ago.

 

[checkoutthehook]

I wouldnt trust this image (just doesnt look like it was taken well).

What makes you think it has a super ideal cut?

Based on the cut proportions. I posted them again below. I’m guessing then that the diamond could still perform well, it’s just that the scope image isn’t good enough to tell?

 

[checkoutthehook]

Based on the cut proportions. I posted them again below. I’m guessing then that the diamond could still perform well, it’s just that the scope image isn’t good enough to tell?

Sorry, posted above. Not below.

 

[free-user]

The angles are the diamond are not a direct tell tale of a diamonds cut. Images will confirm that and something like a sarin. I'd stuck with ags if you were going only by report if you want a "super ideal cut".

 

[flyingpig]

Badly taken ASET.
If well taken, I expect no to very little light leakage. Promising

 

[tyty333]

It has numbers that fit in the range of what Super Ideal cut stones are in but that does not make it a super ideal cut.

 

[free-user]

It has numbers that fit in the range of what Super Ideal cut stones are in but that does not make it a super ideal cut.

Nope. I just mentioned it previously. You are confusing report numbers with cut. One does have to " cut" the diamond to get the angles shown but accessing the cut symmetry in further allows manufacturers to declare it a SIC or not.