Haven
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2007
- Messages
- 13,166
I should add that I find it amusing how this discussion has evolved into one that divides women into different categories: feminist, traditional, anti-feminist, weak, et cetera. Or, in other words, we are renaming these women as feminists, traditionalists, etc.
Does anyone else see the irony here? We are talking about identifying with names, and then we use the way women choose to incorporate or not incorporate their husband''s surnames into their own names to identify them as members of groups that we either do or do not approve of.
I just think it was worth noting. And it''s one reason why I personally think it is a dangerous practice to use things like names, or gender, or race, or ethnicity, or belongings to identify others, or ourselves.
Does anyone else see the irony here? We are talking about identifying with names, and then we use the way women choose to incorporate or not incorporate their husband''s surnames into their own names to identify them as members of groups that we either do or do not approve of.
I just think it was worth noting. And it''s one reason why I personally think it is a dangerous practice to use things like names, or gender, or race, or ethnicity, or belongings to identify others, or ourselves.