shape
carat
color
clarity

Join my journey to an overblue stone!

Out of your price range but for anyone else who might be searching the threads

IMG_0594.jpeg
 
Hi @lovedogs, my new pendant si1 is a very strong flourescent like the emerald si1. I was suprised at the range of "very strong". The pendant does not look that strong to me. I would have guessed a medium. Inclusions crystals, feathers
1000004341.jpg
 
Hi @lovedogs, my new pendant si1 is a very strong flourescent like the emerald si1. I was suprised at the range of "very strong". The pendant does not look that strong to me. I would have guessed a medium. Inclusions crystals, feathers
1000004341.jpg

Holy crap! So surprised!
 
Right?!

I love my crazy very strong blue emerald. This very strong round was wimpy in comparison!

Edit whoops, I can't read, this is just a strong - whew. I was concerned you would get something like this.

1000004344.jpg
 
Last edited:
Right?!

I love my crazy very strong blue emerald. This very strong round was wimpy in comparison!

Edit whoops, I can't read, this is just a strong - whew. I was concerned you would get something like this.

1000004344.jpg

Yeah, that's so interesting!
 
Ooooo dat's niiiiice
 
@Karl_K @Rockdiamond

Theres a stone from a vendor that has "faint" fluor, but looks like this under UV. How is that possible?

Screenshot_20240426_054812_WhatsApp.jpg

I have seen a stone in person that was GIA none under the gia grading lights that was that blue under sunlight.
We tested it with a bunch of different UV sources and some wavelengths it reacted greatly and some it didn't.
So if everything is on the up and up with the pic and it could be the answer is its reacting to different wavelengths of UV,
Arguably GIA publicly uses the wrong wavelength.
 
I have a faint blue K that looks more blue in the sun than my medium fluor L. Much bluer. Both GIA graded, both step cuts.
 
I have seen a stone in person that was GIA none under the gia grading lights that was that blue under sunlight.
We tested it with a bunch of different UV sources and some wavelengths it reacted greatly and some it didn't.
So if everything is on the up and up with the pic and it could be the answer is its reacting to different wavelengths of UV,
Arguably GIA publicly uses the wrong wavelength.

ok--at least that makes a bit of sense. I almost was doubting that it was the same stone. Just to be careful I'll likely ask for a pic of the inscription.
 
I have seen a stone in person that was GIA none under the gia grading lights that was that blue under sunlight.
We tested it with a bunch of different UV sources and some wavelengths it reacted greatly and some it didn't.
So if everything is on the up and up with the pic and it could be the answer is its reacting to different wavelengths of UV,
Arguably GIA publicly uses the wrong wavelength.

This makes sense. It’s understandable that the labs have to pick a wavelength but there are so many neat optical effects (+ undesirable ones) that consumers can’t discern.
 
This makes sense. It’s understandable that the labs have to pick a wavelength but there are so many neat optical effects (+ undesirable ones) that consumers can’t discern.

Historically GIA and many other industries used what they did based on what was available and it became the standard.
These days if you want to pay for it you can get narrow band UV leds in ~10nm increments.
The cheap ones are around 400nm which works well for most UV reactive diamonds but there are exceptions.
 
ok--at least that makes a bit of sense.
I am trying to decide if that is a compliment or not. LOL

But yea check the inscription and return policy.
 
I am trying to decide if that is a compliment or not. LOL

But yea check the inscription and return policy.

lolllll no it's a huge compliment! I had no idea what was going on, and was afraid I was looking at a different stone. But your explanation makes me feel better :)
 
I have no idea what’s going on…. But that pic is wack
 
@freddyboston what do you think of these, and can you look them up on idexx to see if listings say milky?


 
If you find "the one" what will you do with it?
 
Last edited:
Probably Very Strong is best effect but here's a .60 D Light Milky Strong
1729427529134.png

A .40 H Si1 Light Milky Very Strong
1729428626964.png


For fun... here's a 4ct I Si2 Light Milky Strong 60/60.....
1729429722968.png

 
Probably Very Strong is best effect but here's a .60 D Light Milky Strong
1729427529134.png

A .40 H Si1 Light Milky Very Strong
1729428626964.png


For fun... here's a 4ct I Si2 Light Milky Strong 60/60.....
1729429722968.png


I really like the D si1, but yeah I'm nervous that strong fluor won't give the weird look I'm hoping for.

Sucks that the 2 i found aren't listed! So annoying. It would be easier to be confident if I could see that the vendor labeled it milky.
 
over 1ct and $$$ pricey for a milky VSB.... but here's a very strong F..... the studio lights are killing the contrast in the arrows so must be something @ UV sunlight... decent cut..

@ $3k or so I'd probably buy it myself :)

1729446582626.png
1729446624010.png


 
I suspect a uv torch on the stone outside. Check out light reflections on tweasers.
 
lovedogs, what is the weird look you're seeking? I like inclusions and fluor but your taste is way more evolved.
 
lovedogs, what is the weird look you're seeking? I like inclusions and fluor but your taste is way more evolved.

This video (@Rhino it's you!) shows a comparison of an "overblue" vs "regular blue". I am seeking something like the "overblue", except potentially even milkier/hazier in direct sunlight.


Didn't read this article, but basically a stone like the first pic where it's clearly kind of milky/hazy so it'll look weird in direct sunlight:
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top