kenny|1432838652|3882338 said:Accurate photography of colored gems is extremly difficult even if you have the best camera, lens, lighting and years of experience.
The vast majority of the public is drastically misinformed about photography.
There is this "the camera doesn't lie, only photoshop lies" mentality which is false on both counts.
What comes directly out of even the best cameras with the best lighting and environment is rarely true to life.
Correcting the pic to become more true-to-life happens in Photoshop, or a similar program.
Post processing is essential and, if done by a person with the goal of honesty not dishonesty, will result in a MORE true pic.
I'm sorry that you feel the gem does not match LM's pic.
But taking any pics and posting them proves nothing, absolutely nothing.
It only demonstrates how unreliable and not-believeable the photography process is.
I cringe several times a day here when people make judgements about gems based on pics taken by a hobbyist or a pro.
The only way to be truly confident about pic accuracy is to buy several colored gems from a vendor and discover that their pics are accurate.
Even though the ring does not meet your expectations I believe you'll have no trouble selling it, especially with an AGL report.
Also thanks for posting that LM accepted an offer 33% below list, at least in this case.
That is a powerful negotiating tool you have provided every person who reads this thread.
Good luck.
PieAreSquared|1432841386|3882351 said:BTW, OP: the photos you posted make this ring look gorgeous. Is it not that gorgeous in person, or do you think you just have buyers remorse?
Chrono|1432839172|3882342 said:Kenny,
Most upstanding vendors do the best they can in trying to match the photograph to the stone. If it doesn't match up, they will make a note of it in the description. Many vendors have no qualms about making the pictures look better than the stone. I do not photoshop or make any colour correction. Yes, I take both accurate and inaccurate pictures this way, but I only post pictures that come even close to the actual stone. And yes, I throw out 100 bad pictures to get that 1 representative picture. If I were to purchase without relying on accurate pictures, I would be out thousands of dollars on shipping returns.
[/quote]minousbijoux|1432842381|3882362 said:The caveat is that the photos should be as representative of what we see in hand (which, too, will change depending on one's longitude) and we buyers must be vigilant in learning which vendors have accurate photos - otherwise we bankrupt ourselves with the ancillary costs of shipping, etc.
PieAreSquared|1432841386|3882351 said:kenny|1432838652|3882338 said:Accurate photography of colored gems is extremly difficult even if you have the best camera, lens, lighting and years of experience.
The vast majority of the public is drastically misinformed about photography.
There is this "the camera doesn't lie, only photoshop lies" mentality which is false on both counts.
What comes directly out of even the best cameras with the best lighting and environment is rarely true to life.
Correcting the pic to become more true-to-life happens in Photoshop, or a similar program.
Post processing is essential and, if done by a person with the goal of honesty not dishonesty, will result in a MORE true pic.
I'm sorry that you feel the gem does not match LM's pic.
But taking any pics and posting them proves nothing, absolutely nothing.
It only demonstrates how unreliable and not-believeable the photography process is.
I cringe several times a day here when people make judgements about gems based on pics taken by a hobbyist or a pro.
The only way to be truly confident about pic accuracy is to buy several colored gems from a vendor and discover that their pics are accurate.
Even though the ring does not meet your expectations I believe you'll have no trouble selling it, especially with an AGL report.
Also thanks for posting that LM accepted an offer 33% below list, at least in this case.
That is a powerful negotiating tool you have provided every person who reads this thread.
Good luck.
+1
Thank you Kenny, I have enjoyed your numerous Photoshop rants, as I agree with you 100%.
What I really hate to see is when someone says: "These pictures I took aren't how it actually looks to me, but gosh darn it, I'm going to post them anyway". This is not helpful, and often harmful. You may actually have a fantastic stone but photos lie and we all think, "gad that is hideous, return it!" so you do and miss out. Or, the vendor is branded for having "misleading" photos -misleading only in comparison to the consumer's photos, we don't actually know what the thing looks like.
It has been my experience in my profession that people always believe their eyes first, and rarely read descriptions (or follow directions).
BTW, OP: the photos you posted make this ring look gorgeous. Is it not that gorgeous in person, or do you think you just have buyers remorse?
NKOTB|1432853664|3882479 said:I love it!! More so in your pics than his. Hope you grow to love it once you get over the sticker shock, or make it all back in a quick sale.