widget
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2004
- Messages
- 4,255
I've posted this ring before...but it's never "starred" in it's very own thread. Was playing with my camera, and thought I'd share.
I always refer to this as "Mom's diamond"...it doesn't feel like mine. I feel sort of like I have "temporary custody' of it.
Dad bought it from a jeweler/friend in the '60s. It is said to have come out of an estate from the '20s-'30s. It was uncertified. I guess this means that it is sort of a contemporary of the original asschers, but obviously isn't one: small clipped corners and not an octagon...and not really square, either!
I got the ring after my Mom died, and eventually had it certified and remounted.
Here are the stats: (GIA)
Emerald Cut
9.15X8.23X5.89
3.91 carat
Depth: 71.6%
Table: 61%
Girdle: Thin to Very Thick
Culet: Medium
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Good
VS-1
E
Fluorescence: None
Comments: Additional extra facets are not shown
Here's an OLD picture of how it looked when my Mom had it. (She wore it 24/7)
I always refer to this as "Mom's diamond"...it doesn't feel like mine. I feel sort of like I have "temporary custody' of it.
Dad bought it from a jeweler/friend in the '60s. It is said to have come out of an estate from the '20s-'30s. It was uncertified. I guess this means that it is sort of a contemporary of the original asschers, but obviously isn't one: small clipped corners and not an octagon...and not really square, either!
I got the ring after my Mom died, and eventually had it certified and remounted.
Here are the stats: (GIA)
Emerald Cut
9.15X8.23X5.89
3.91 carat
Depth: 71.6%
Table: 61%
Girdle: Thin to Very Thick
Culet: Medium
Polish: Good
Symmetry: Good
VS-1
E
Fluorescence: None
Comments: Additional extra facets are not shown
Here's an OLD picture of how it looked when my Mom had it. (She wore it 24/7)