Need a womans opinion

[JiltedGen]

Can someone kindly tell which setting they think is nicer:

http://www.michaelcfina.com/ic/mcfina/sections/wedding_engagement_rings/engagement_rings/mark_patterson_engagement_rings/:product/code/PL0689PROM0004.html?block=1

http://www.michaelcfina.com/ic/mcfina/sections/wedding_engagement_rings/engagement_rings/hearts_on_fire_engagement_rings/:product/code/180536FELC0377.html?block=1

Your comments would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

 

[Hera]

I like the first one

 

[katebar]

No question first one for me!

 

[JiltedGen]

Can any of you recommend a unique setting?

 

[justageek]

There are lots of unique settings! Too many to give you in one post. And what's to say that any of our recommendations will turn out to be what you're looking for, when the only parameter is "uniqueness"? I can tell you what I think is unique and pretty, but you'd get much more help from this forum if you have specifics. Anything you're looking for in particular?

 

[JiltedGen]

Unique to me something different yet classy, out of the ordinary. Perhaps something like this:

http://bmor.com/Cart_4Item_Info.asp?ItemNo=14F_T.jpg&StartID=0&Counter=&SortBy=&Category=Solitude&Collections=Anniversary%20/%20Engagement%20Rings%20Collection&KeyWord=&SubCategory=&SubCategory2=&Price=&Material=&Occassion=&SaleStatus=

 

[Diamond*Dana]

I like the more delicate look of the second one.

 

[samii]

I''m not sure if you wanted this for an engagement ring or a promise ring, but I would lean towards the first one.

The second one is nice but doesn''t have the elegance of the first.

The third one is lovely and unique, but I''m one of those girls that want to wear their engagement, wedding and eternity ring on the one finger so would find it hard to get rings to match. On the other hand, there are lots of girls that don''t want to be able to wear all their rings on the one finger, or like the contrast of different bands - only you know what kind of girl your special one is.

Good luck!

 

[kellyfish]

I like the 1st and 2nd--but think #2 will make the stone look bigger due to the shank being closer together. #3 is a big no to me--looks dated. I think it is great that you are trying to get a unique and beautiful setting!! The top 2 are really nice...

 

[Ellen]

I too like the first one the best. However, which one best suits your girls personality? That''s the one you should get, whether any of us like it or not.

 

[Rhea]

Have you decided yet?

I really like the 2nd one.

 

[dani13]

The first one is really pretty- just more delicate looking than the second, thats why I prefer it.

 

[bee*]

I love the first one too. It''s beautiful!

 

[Tacori E-ring]

I like the first one better. Good luck!

 

[Kaleigh]

They are both lovely, but I like the first one better.

 

[starryeyed]

I like the Mark Patterson, the first one. It looks less forced, more elegant. It looks like it''s more about complimenting the diamond. The second looks like it''s all about the setting, and not the diamond. I hope that makes sense.

I love the pave split shank setting! I have one myself by Leon Mege.

 

[monarch64]

#1!

 

[Jypsie]

I love the Eday setting here: http://www.maevona.com/index.htm?gclid=COKl5_HUrpACFQj4gAodj2kvJw

Between the 2 listed - #1

 

[mintve]

ooh, I like the first one, very pretty!!

 

[Missrocks]

First one is way more elegant. #1 for sure.

I don''t like the prominant prongs on the second.

 

[E B]

Definitely the first!

 

[pinkprincessnovo]

the 1st ring is nicer to my opinion if the finger is thick like mines but if the finger is thin skinni finger than the 2nd one

 

[dianek]

I much prefer the first one. It is very elegant & unique. The second one is OK, but nothing special. The third one is not great for lots of reasons - dated, common in the 1980s, and hard to wear a wedding band with.

 

[vespergirl]

I like the second one.

 

[steph72276]

I like the 2nd one. It is much more delicate so it will really make the center stone the focus.

 

[HollyS]

Number 2, number 2, number 2!!!!!!!!!



But, did you notice #2 is specifically designed for a .75 carat?

Number 3 is a no. Too modern while being too retro 80s.