Newbie Here With Some E-Ring Questions

[ibdrinken]

Also another stupid question. I was looking on the WF site and saw the ACA princess cut and was wondering what the diff was between that and the other princess on their site

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 1/13/2009 8:32:02 AM
Author: ibdrinken
Also another stupid question. I was looking on the WF site and saw the ACA princess cut and was wondering what the diff was between that and the other princess on their site

No question is stupid!

This page explains about ACA Princess and the research and development needed to bring this brand to the consumer.

http://www.whiteflash.com/diamonds_info/t/all_about.aspx?articleid=347&zoneid=22

Other in house diamonds may come under the Expert Selection category.

http://www.whiteflash.com/diamonds_info/t/all_about.aspx?articleid=25&zoneid=22

 

[ibdrinken]

So many choices so little money lol. So the ACA is better than the rest. I think I am leaning towards that way. Thanks again, you are a wealth of info.

 

[ibdrinken]

So the next question is JA or WF. Iknow yall are prob going to say its up to me but I was looking on the JA site and they have a more of a higher caret for a lower priceand the color and clarity are close.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 1/13/2009 11:47:09 AM
Author: ibdrinken
So the next question is JA or WF. Iknow yall are prob going to say its up to me but I was looking on the JA site and they have a more of a higher caret for a lower priceand the color and clarity are close.

It depends who has the diamond you like best, and which vendors offer the best long term benefits for your situation, both are great vendors - WF offer ASET which are very useful for fancy shape analysis whereas JA do not, also the terms of their upgrade policies differ should that ever be a consideration.

 

[ibdrinken]

Well let me ask this. If I was go lower i nthe quality Icould get a bigger stone correct.

 

[Lorelei]

Date: 1/18/2009 11:25:58 PM
Author: ibdrinken
Well let me ask this. If I was go lower i nthe quality Icould get a bigger stone correct.

Possibly, if an SI clarity was verified eyeclean to your standards.