Picture of 2 ct., E, SI1

[Beckywecky]

I’m not sure if you can tell from this picture, but does this look like a good SI1 as far as the inclusions? I’m a novice, very hard for me to tell. Thank you.

 

[headlight]

I don’t see an issue with the clarity characteristics, but the proportions are not especially desirable to me. I don’t like the table larger than the depth, and I don’t like such a shallow crown. But you will certainly get a large look. Did you run it through the HCA?

 

[Beckywecky]

I don’t see an issue with the clarity characteristics, but the proportions are not especially desirable to me. I don’t like the table larger than the depth, and I don’t like such a shallow crown. But you will certainly get a large look. Did you run it through the HCA?

I tried to use that tool, but it said I needed to use the paid business one- no idea why, I'm a consumer. What are the disadvantages to these proportions? I've been told they are excellent, will give me what you call a "large look," hard to find like this. What would I be sacrificing with these proportions?

 

[maryjane04]

On your previous thread someone posted that the HCA for this stone was 0.9 and that it was worth considering.

 

[Snowdrop13]

On your previous thread someone posted that the HCA for this stone was 0.9 and that it was worth considering.

This stone had a score of 5+, the other one, D Si1 scored 0.9. Sorry if I wasn’t clear!

@Beckywecky it‘s a bit confusing having 2 threads about the same stones, maybe you could ask the mods to merge them?