- Joined
- Nov 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,148
Nsmike|1471220278|4066076 said:Theredspinel, just an observation, with the softness of moonstone, I would make sure the corners are protected against chipping. The solitaire mounts don't do that, the ring, that I posted earlier does. For an occasional wear ring, I'm sure the solitaire mounts are adequate, but beautiful items intended for occasional wear, sometimes become regular wear items.
Your right I was thinking that the corners came up above the stone but the second picture shows that's not the case. With the prongs in the corner you do get some protection. I worked with a former jeweler and inherited some of his bias. He would do insurance appraisals on his mother's shop letterhead for clients. I can still hear him talk about chipped stones that could have been avoided with a different setting. He showed me a ring that had a raised scroll in the corners and prongs in the center. Each corner was protected for about 1/4 of the length of the stone. The scroll on the ring I posted looked similar but I didn't look close enough.marymm|1471221144|4066081 said:Nsmike|1471220278|4066076 said:Theredspinel, just an observation, with the softness of moonstone, I would make sure the corners are protected against chipping. The solitaire mounts don't do that, the ring, that I posted earlier does. For an occasional wear ring, I'm sure the solitaire mounts are adequate, but beautiful items intended for occasional wear, sometimes become regular wear items.
Perhaps I'm missing something, but based on the 2 photos included in the etsy setting you linked to, it is a basic 4-prong setting, with 4 regular prongs securing the stone. All of the Stuller settings in this thread also have 4 regular prongs securing the center stone. Would you please more particularly describe how/why the etsy 4-prong setting provides more protection than other 4-prong settings? I ask out of genuine interest.