- Joined
- Oct 24, 2012
- Messages
- 8,882
Not mine, but trying on watches for the wishlist…
For context, I have large wrists and wear 18cm Love bangle
New rose gold + diamond bezel Balon Bleu, size 33 - which was the perfect size!
so pretty! BUT I find their RG very coppery and less flattering than Tiffany’s alloy to be honest. Granted my skin looks particular pale and pink in the store lighting…
Stainless steel versions…I like the plain stainless steel best. I hoped they had the 2-tone rose gold and stainless steel, or the rose gold with the brown leather strap, but they didn’t…so they gave me a catalogue!
Panthere in Large - I really fell in love! I tried on the Tank as well but didn’t like it well enough to take pics
Congrats @Paisley2628!!
I'm still working on my more-than-twelve Bling is the best celebration though!!
Nope not sold!! I did think about rehoming it once, but then I came to my sensesHi @yssie
I know I'm going back many years (!!!), and you have sold this bracelet-But...
I was wondering what your thoughts are on the Cartier Trinity bangle.
There isn't much written on PS about it.
I've haven't seen many photos of it being worn - tons of Love/JUC - but not so much the Trintiy bangle. I was thinking of maybe using it with stacking the Love/JUC.
Thank you!
Nope not sold!! I did think about rehoming it once, but then I came to my senses
This one’s a bucket list piece for me. I love that I have it, and I really enjoy taking it out to look at and admire (I do this fairly frequently LOL), and I wear it occasionally. But I only wear it occasionally. Couple reasons for that -
1. The bangles are totally round. Not oval. So they protrude a lot more - they don’t conform to the wrist or lower forearm shape the way oval bangles do. If that makes any sense?
And a followup to #1 - the "rolling" action that's so lovely and buttery in the rings is equally efficient and buttery in the bangles... But most people's forearms are pretty fleshy, and a trio of reasonably heavy bangles very-efficiently rolling up one's forearm creates forearm muffin like I've never before experienced When I wear it I stack a skinny diamond bangle on top (closer to elbow) to mask the forearm muffin. Works great.
2. The clanging! OMG. The three bangles clink and clang and click and jingle and jangle and… I don’t know why or how but they’re seriously *so* much louder than any of my other bangles stacked (which do also move against each other). My Trinity is the original with thicker (heavier) bangles - I wonder if the lighter Trinity is less loud?
So I guess my biggest question would be what your noisy arm tolerance is like
In all seriousness though. I don't know how visually appealing and comfy the bangle shape difference would be IRL. But if you love the idea it doesn't hurt to try on!
Nope not sold!! I did think about rehoming it once, but then I came to my senses
This one’s a bucket list piece for me. I love that I have it, and I really enjoy taking it out to look at and admire (I do this fairly frequently LOL), and I wear it occasionally. But I only wear it occasionally. Couple reasons for that -
1. The bangles are totally round. Not oval. So they protrude a lot more - they don’t conform to the wrist or lower forearm shape the way oval bangles do. If that makes any sense?
And a followup to #1 - the "rolling" action that's so lovely and buttery in the rings is equally efficient and buttery in the bangles... But most people's forearms are pretty fleshy, and a trio of reasonably heavy bangles very-efficiently rolling up one's forearm creates forearm muffin like I've never before experienced When I wear it I stack a skinny diamond bangle on top (closer to elbow) to mask the forearm muffin. Works great.
2. The clanging! OMG. The three bangles clink and clang and click and jingle and jangle and… I don’t know why or how but they’re seriously *so* much louder than any of my other bangles stacked (which do also move against each other). My Trinity is the original with thicker (heavier) bangles - I wonder if the lighter Trinity is less loud?
So I guess my biggest question would be what your noisy arm tolerance is like
In all seriousness though. I don't know how visually appealing and comfy the bangle shape difference would be IRL. But if you love the idea it doesn't hurt to try on!
Thank you so very much. And I’m so glad you like the choice for the Alhambra over the rose Ecrou!Ah! I was just thinking in the other thread that I didn’t recall your JUC Congratulations on your achievement and very happy belated celebration
I like the plain Ecrou better too. And “yes” to having it plated so it matches everything else you’ve got going on! It’ll be worth the wait. And another “yes” to leaving the RG behind, I like your Alhambra much more, independently and in your stack!
Y’all ready for a smorgasbord of Cartier photos?
These are all things I tried and did not purchase. It was a wonderful and educational experience!
First up, medium Clash in white gold. I thought I would love love love this piece. And if I were after it to wear alone I would. It has movement and is truly fascinating and beautifully made. I love the almost punk aesthetic. I did try it in the rose/yellow gold but it is truly a unique color and did not suit my pinkish skin tone so I didn’t even take a photo.
Perspective photo of medium Clash.
What I found with it with sizing is that the size I liked was an 18. Nice movement and feel on my arm. 17 was just a little too close. However, 18 overlapped my VCA signature perlee in a way that I would not have been comfortable with. And 17 was not going to be comfortable.
18 in other Cartier is a perfect fit with VCA large, btw (I’m talking JUC and Ecrou).
This whole collection is dreamy. Love alllll of it! The small love looks so delicate and feminine!