courtneyclv
Shiny_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2006
- Messages
- 125
I went back to the jeweler again to make sure I still loved my ring. I did
so BF and I put down money officially hold it! The sales lady suggested I come in and not sit by the 'setting' section. I have the tendency to ALWAYSSSSS change my mind about EVERYTHING...second guess my thoughts. I didn't want more info to cloud my already spinning head! I hate how I do that and always want to find something I like just a tiny itty little bitty bit more! LOLLOL
The setting is kind of like this..channel set baguettes, 4 prongs to hold the 1.21 princess cut, engraved sides with some small pave diamonds. .64tcw, platinum.
Here are the specs of the princess cut...
1.21 center stone
F color
SI1
No graining, No flourescence
cutlet- none
5.82
by
5.68
by
4.18
depth 73.6
table width 71%
crown 13%
pavillion 57%
girdle medium/facetedsymetry good/very good
polish good/very good
It kinda looks like this..except there is no space under the center stone, in the band, and there are less diamonds in general. And less 'thick' This one is 2.20tcw. Mine is classy, a little bit antique, and timeless...and VERY sparkly!
I will post pics when I get it!!! Possibly a few weeks! (or when my man asks me..)
The setting is kind of like this..channel set baguettes, 4 prongs to hold the 1.21 princess cut, engraved sides with some small pave diamonds. .64tcw, platinum.
Here are the specs of the princess cut...
1.21 center stone
F color
SI1
No graining, No flourescence
cutlet- none
5.82
by
5.68
by
4.18
depth 73.6
table width 71%
crown 13%
pavillion 57%
girdle medium/facetedsymetry good/very good
polish good/very good
It kinda looks like this..except there is no space under the center stone, in the band, and there are less diamonds in general. And less 'thick' This one is 2.20tcw. Mine is classy, a little bit antique, and timeless...and VERY sparkly!
I will post pics when I get it!!! Possibly a few weeks! (or when my man asks me..)