- Joined
- Jul 27, 2005
- Messages
- 4,165
Even this EXAMPLE is casually sexist in tone. She''s the employee I suppose? He''s the Boss?Date: 11/15/2006 2:02:32 AM
Author: Adylon
It''s like 2 employees that want a raise. Employee #1 just goes straight to her boss and asks for a raise, laying out all her arguements why she feels she is entitled to one. Employee #2 finds out what she needs to do to get the raise and does it, and if she can do so without even asking him, even better. If you were the boss, which employee would you give the raise too?
LMAO. He knows what he''s getting into, he''s seen the Prada. He''s also going to be seeing a new exciting tax bracket with our combined incomes so I doubt its a major concern that I like some nice things.Date: 11/15/2006 1:57:52 AM
Author: strmrdr
No,Date: 11/15/2006 1:52:11 AM
Author: decodelighted
Well it speaks VOLUMES that you''d rather tell your true love to ''hit the road'' than have a mature, two-way, mutually respectful discussion about the topic.Date: 11/15/2006 1:47:47 AM
Author: strmrdr
interesting that 90% of the people saying go for it are Ladies and 90% saying no way are guys.
Think about that, you willing to get told to hit the road over it?
It means id never marry a materialistic gal.
And there are a lot of guys out there that feel the same.
.....................
As far as going online for a better deal goes thats good advice.
okay so i know it's time for bed when i find myself thinking of how to adapt the example up above into lemon vs kiwi pie. yes. bed. 'purse'.Date: 11/15/2006 2:17:02 AM
Author: decodelighted
Even this EXAMPLE is casually sexist in tone. She's the employee I suppose? He's the Boss?Date: 11/15/2006 2:02:32 AM
Author: Adylon
It's like 2 employees that want a raise. Employee #1 just goes straight to her boss and asks for a raise, laying out all her arguements why she feels she is entitled to one. Employee #2 finds out what she needs to do to get the raise and does it, and if she can do so without even asking him, even better. If you were the boss, which employee would you give the raise too?
What about a DIFFERENT boss who has two employeess ... one who brings in $6000 worth of business to the company and one who brings in $10,000 worth of business. Which should he LAYOFF?
And, yes, I'm kidding. My example is a PARODY of his.
Now I''m really laughing. OMG, I was employee #1 with my new job. I just went to them and negotiated a higher salary before I started. Sitting around hoping someone gives you a raise magically hasn''t worked in my experience. What''s the problem with just saying why you should get it? Btw. after I did that I helped my fiance do the same with his job offer.Date: 11/15/2006 2:18:27 AM
Author: Mara
okay so i know it''s time for bed when i find myself thinking of how to adapt the example up above into lemon vs kiwi pie. yes. bed. ''purse''.Date: 11/15/2006 2:17:02 AM
Author: decodelighted
Even this EXAMPLE is casually sexist in tone. She''s the employee I suppose? He''s the Boss?Date: 11/15/2006 2:02:32 AM
Author: Adylon
It''s like 2 employees that want a raise. Employee #1 just goes straight to her boss and asks for a raise, laying out all her arguements why she feels she is entitled to one. Employee #2 finds out what she needs to do to get the raise and does it, and if she can do so without even asking him, even better. If you were the boss, which employee would you give the raise too?
What about a DIFFERENT boss who has two employeess ... one who brings in $6000 worth of business to the company and one who brings in $10,000 worth of business. Which should he LAYOFF?
And, yes, I''m kidding. My example is a PARODY of his.
Thanks! I think I''ve lost my politeness lately. Alas.Date: 11/15/2006 2:03:36 AM
Author: KristyDarling
Winternight, you''ve been given some great advice and please do NOT feel bad about opening up a dialogue with your BF about the ring. It just sounds like you two reeeeally need to talk about it....that''s all. My guess is you''ve never really told him how meaningful this ring is to you, and how much you appreciate a high-quality piece of jewelry. I have a feeling he''ll understand. Go for it!
I''m tired of the old-fashioned attitude of men as givers and women as receivers....that women should just be grateful for whatever they''re given, period. A lot of men don''t ''get'' that we women want to LOVE our ring....YES we understand that it''s the love and the relationship that counts most (duh! like we need someone to tell us that)....YES we understand that the size of the diamond is not correlated with how much he loves her. But here''s the thing: some women like small and dainty, others like large and blingy. NEITHER IS BETTER THAN THE OTHER. It''s just an aesthetic, that is all. If a woman wants her financially strapped BF to buy her a 20K ring, then yes she needs to lower expectations and maybe look into a vendor with a great upgrade policy (there''s always 5th, 10th, 20th anniversaries). BUT....if a couple are both good earners with a bright financial future ahead, there is absolutely no reason why she can''t let her BF know exactly what she wants. It''s all about *being reasonable within your means.* And that is Winternight. She does not strike me as princessy at all. Not one bit.
And kudos to you, Winter, for remaining classy and polite even when others are not.You are a better woman than I, that''s fer sure!
Date: 11/15/2006 2:17:02 AM
Author: decodelighted
Even this EXAMPLE is casually sexist in tone. She's the employee I suppose? He's the Boss?
What about a DIFFERENT boss who has two employeess ... one who brings in $6000 worth of business to the company and one who brings in $10,000 worth of business. Which should he LAYOFF?
And, yes, I'm kidding. My example is a PARODY of his.
Date: 11/15/2006 2:31:53 AM
Author: winternight
Date: 11/15/2006 2:03:36 AM
Seriously, its not like I'm going for the two month pseudo-rule, haha, perhaps I'll point that out.
Very interesting gender issues. What about poor me having to co-pay for a wedding ceremony because my fiance wants one, where is my sympathy from the guys who are all upset about him paying for a ring??? What if I just want to elope and that's my budget? Do I have to give in to an actually reception? Should we talk about it - as he has been telling me he wants one - or should I tell him to hit the road for being materialistic and showy, after all I don't care what people think about us not being traditional and throwing a party.
BINGO!!!!Fair is fair.
Date: 11/15/2006 2:31:53 AM
Author: winternight
What about poor me having to co-pay for a wedding ceremony because my fiance wants one, where is my sympathy???Date: 11/15/2006 2:03:36 AM
Author: KristyDarling
I''m tired of the old-fashioned attitude of men as givers and women as receivers....that women should just be grateful for whatever they''re given, period.
What if I just want to elope and that''s my budget? Do I have to give in to a reception - as he has been telling me he wants one - or should I tell him to hit the road for being materialistic and showy
Leaving aside the boss/raise analogy I''m sure that my fiance thinks that $6,000 will buy a nice ring from Tiffanys - I have no doubt that he was floored by the actual prices. I really, really doubt he did much more than look at the rings there and frankly I don''t know that he looked at prices, knowing him probably not because he seemed surprised. We went in there after he bought me a couple of silver things and I got a pair of gold earrings with diamonds which he had no idea weren''t that much because he never asked/looked in that section. I don''t even think he''s looked at the website.Date: 11/15/2006 2:02:32 AM
Author: Adylon
I hope you can see my point however. It''s like 2 employees that want a raise. Employee #1 just goes straight to her boss and asks for a raise, laying out all her arguements why she feels she is entitled to one. Employee #2 finds out what she needs to do to get the raise and does it, and if she can do so without even asking him, even better.
If you were the boss, which employee would you give the raise too?
Like I said I think you need to determine why he set the budget where he has before you decide to ask for a bigger budget.
Even if I was a billionaire, I would never give my fiance anything bigger then 1.5cts. Because I would want her to wear it everyday, and without fear of losing it, getting robbed, etc.
Oh its just I''ve had some of the worst interviews as a female attorney - and don''t even get me into the new guy who keeps looking me up and down - EW! (Even my friend noticed it, ew he''s married, ew anyways).Date: 11/15/2006 2:32:27 AM
Author: Adylon
I don''t make the rules, the man buys the woman the ring. That''s why the ''boss'' was male and the ''employee'' female in my example, sorry if this offends you...
I''d layoff the uglier of the two, even if it meant losing $4k/mo in gross revenue.
And yes that is a parody of your parody I''m just digging myself in a bigger hole, aren''t I? Can''t we all just get along? Why does this have to be such a politically correct world? I still think the poster should find out why the budget is what it is before trying to up the $$$. If he drives a ferrari and didn''t buy me a 3 carat rock I''d be pissed off too.
Maybe he drives a toyota tercel and is just very frugal with his money which explains his large savings account and good fiscal standing. Maybe he wants to have 10 kids and get them all to graduate harvard and become lawyers too.
I really like your spirit. Also love that you have handled yourself with grace amongst some less than polite posters. I look forward to seeing what you guys decide upon, I''m sure whatever it is, it will be gorgeous!!!Date: 11/15/2006 2:42:28 AM
Author: winternight
Leaving aside the boss/raise analogy I''m sure that my fiance thinks that $6,000 will buy a nice ring from Tiffanys - I have no doubt that he was floored by the actual prices. I really, really doubt he did much more than look at the rings there and frankly I don''t know that he looked at prices, knowing him probably not because he seemed surprised. We went in there after he bought me a couple of silver things and I got a pair of gold earrings with diamonds which he had no idea weren''t that much because he never asked/looked in that section. I don''t even think he''s looked at the website.Date: 11/15/2006 2:02:32 AM
Author: Adylon
I hope you can see my point however. It''s like 2 employees that want a raise. Employee #1 just goes straight to her boss and asks for a raise, laying out all her arguements why she feels she is entitled to one. Employee #2 finds out what she needs to do to get the raise and does it, and if she can do so without even asking him, even better.
If you were the boss, which employee would you give the raise too?
Like I said I think you need to determine why he set the budget where he has before you decide to ask for a bigger budget.
Even if I was a billionaire, I would never give my fiance anything bigger then 1.5cts. Because I would want her to wear it everyday, and without fear of losing it, getting robbed, etc.
He can easily pay cash for something around 10k, money isn''t tight at all, that isn''t the issue. The budget was probably just a number he made up or maybe someone said they spent about that.
I live in DC, lots of women will have better rings than that here, on the Metro, plus designer clothes/bags. Its similar to living in NYC. We can get insurance too, not a big deal. BEsides I''ll be adding some earrings and hopefully a diamond bracelet eventually.
respectfully disagreeDate: 11/14/2006 10:29:44 PM
Author: aljdewey
Like Mara, I find this to be an alarmingly ridiculous assertion.Date: 11/14/2006 8:30:19 PM
Author: ladykemma
lojack, they both earn in the six figures. 5000 is almost embarrassing cheap.
Most of the time you're right on, LK, but on this one, gotta disagree.
How much a person makes is only part of any equation, and not even a significant part at that. Too many folks have been buying into the 'size equals how much he loves you' notion. Ridiculous. DeBeers certainly has done its job well, hasn't it?
If I won a lottery, I could afford to buy a mansion. I could likely afford to buy a ridiculous expensive car, too. Should I then feel OBLIGATED to buy a mansion or an outrageously overpriced car if don't value them? No.
My husband makes really good money.....and so do I. By your parameters, our purchase would be considered cheap. But you know what? Both my husband and I have each been in tight financial circumstances in our 'salad' days (before we knew each other), and we're both ultra conservative about how we spend money.
When we shopped for my ring, he offered a budget he was comfortable with. By standards noted here, some may have called him cheap. On the flip side, my husband had NEVER spent that amount of money on a single thing in his life before.....not even for his home computers (and my hubby is a computer geek!). His computers are part of his LIVELIHOOD.....more of a necessity than a luxury, to be sure. So, the idea of spending an excessive amount on a non-essential, non-necessity item was a stretch for him.
Does it mean he didn't love me? NO. Does it mean he tried to 'cheap out'? NO. Does it mean he didn't care about my happiness? Absolutely not. He allotted a sum that was well above any other single purchase he'd ever made for himself, and yet would be considered quite modest by some here, and likely be called 'cheap' by others.
When I shopped, I found something that was more than our budget, and I had a candid conversation with him saying that I found something that would be my nirvana....that I'd never want to upgrade, and that I was willing to chip in for it.
My husband has been MORE than generous with many things over the years. We both would rather save and get what we want the first time, but then again, we need a place to sit or transportation. His feelings about jewelry had NO connotation to how he loved me. He doesn't see the logic in spending ridiculous sums of money for something non-essential. I can absolutely agree with that logic. I can't see the sense in spending a TON of money on a handbag, and yet I know that others feel very comfortable doing it.
One person's *values* and what they feel is reasonable isn't dictated by one's salary alone. Now, if Winter's BF had no problem dropping thousands on vacations and thousands on his own toys, then yeah, I'd agree with your sentiment. But, that's not been established.
The notion that outsiders can decide what HE can afford or should be able to afford based solely on his salary is just outlandish and short-sighted.
Date: 11/14/2006 9:22:08 AM
Author: winternight
The other problem is he told me his budget after we started looking, I asked but he was like 'don't worry about it' when he saw the 13k price tag in the store - afterwards he told me that he was thinking 5-6k. I wish I had never put that solitare on!
No really, I mean it. I asked him and he didn''t offer up any specs other than shape - pear-shapped - that''s it. I''m sure he didn''t look at the prices because he was shocked my the prices when he was with me, not totally freaked out but certainly shocked.Date: 11/15/2006 10:47:52 AM
Author: lienTN
I just read the thread again (sorry, it''s a bit long and I read very fast before but have re-read since) since your FI is the one who wants you to buy from Tiffany''s, I wonder if this is a bit of a ruse on his part (for example, he may say he is thinking about $5-6k but is really planning to spend more)? He must have had his reason(s) and must have done some research beforehand, either by visiting a Tiffany store or talking to someone who owns a Tiffany''s or both. He cannot have made you going into Tiffany''s without already knowing how expensive they are. I simply refuse to believe this. Furthermore, you''re a lawyer and you wear ''serious'' business attire practically everyday. He must know that a flower ring just wouldn''t match.
Anway, I''d suggest that you go back to Tiffany''s and look at the 1ct solitare together and let him see how happy that would make you and how much you like it. I''ll bet once he''s seen the look on your face, he''ll change his mind (that is, if the $5-6k was truly his initial budget).