Sorry, but just saw this on NSC site

[iLander]

Seriously, do we care anymore after the thread in March?

But since it''s been a couple of months I thought I''d check to see if natural sapphire company has improved the accuracy of their images.

This first one is listed as Pair 902 tw 0.64 ct.

 

[iLander]

Here''s the "other" pair:

Sorry they''re so small, here''s the links, you tell me if it''s exactly the same pair photo (same side views too), being sold as two different pairs.

http://www.thenaturalsapphirecompany.com/Sapphires/Pairs/PR902-B/Round/stoneid=PR902-B

http://www.thenaturalsapphirecompany.com/Sapphires/Pairs/PR1186-B/Round/stoneid=PR1186-B

Makes my head hurt.

I find it interesting that rather than correct the problem, they''ve added a new testimonials section to their site. Why not just fix the problem?

Just thought I''d update everyone, but who really cares anymore?

 

[soberguy]

That is crazy! They are identical except the middle! Werid

 

[iLander]

Not so weird if you read this thread

https://www.pricescope.com/community/threads/unscrupulous-scandalous-status-quo.137658/

I just wanted to update everyone that they''re actually gotten worse, not better. They have no respect for their customers, or the individual beauty of sapphires, or their company heritage.

The previous thread was about them duplicating the same picture of one stone and calling it a "pair". Now they''re running the same "pair" photo as two different pairs.

Amazing.

When I googled "natural sapphire company" (they''re definitely not a bookmark of mine} I noticed one of the google suggestions was "natural sapphire company complaints". It''s gotten bad if google is suggesting "complaints" after your name.

 

[choro72]

I''m having a fun time switching between the two tabs and watching the middle part switch back and forth. Someone should make a gif animation out of it

 

[Indylady]

Right. When I talked to the president of the NSC, he told em that pairs are cut identically and look entirely identical, so it makes sense to just copy the picture of one and represent it as the other, rather than taking picture of the pair. The NSC does this because doing taking two separate pictures, or pictures of the pair, takes too much time.

But how do you explain using the same picture, for two different pairs whose carat weight differs by nearly 20 points?