IWantAMilkshake
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2007
- Messages
- 81
Yep, but there are lots of other "not before the wedding ceremony" rules that I've brokenDate: 2/19/2008 6:15:42 PM
Author:IWantAMilkshake
People do this? Is this not against the whole bride/groom not seeing each other thing, or are they photos that can be done separately, or what?
I don''t want that "look", but FI insists on it. He says it''s the part of the wedding he looks forward to the most. I guess I should be thankful that THAT''S what he looks forward to most and not the cake or the open bar.Date: 2/19/2008 9:34:02 PM
Author: musey
Yep, but there are lots of other ''not before the wedding ceremony'' rules that I''ve brokenDate: 2/19/2008 6:15:42 PM
Author:IWantAMilkshake
People do this? Is this not against the whole bride/groom not seeing each other thing, or are they photos that can be done separately, or what?so I figure we can buck that tradition, too
Our photographer suggested that if we don''t want to see each other before the ceremony, we should still consider doing all the other pictures beforehand (bridal party, family shots, etc.). Not only because it saves time after, but also because everyone''s makeup is more likely to be intact before the ceremony.
I don''t mind if FI sees me in my dress before my aisle-walk. He''s actually already seen pictures of me in my dressI can understand women wanting to get that ''look'' from their husband-to-be right before heading down the aisle, though!
Well then, there ya go! Were you looking to be convinced otherwise? Or just genuine curiosity?Date: 2/19/2008 9:47:15 PM
Author: IWantAMilkshake
I don't want that 'look', but FI insists on it. He says it's the part of the wedding he looks forward to the most. I guess I should be thankful that THAT'S what he looks forward to most and not the cake or the open bar.Date: 2/19/2008 9:34:02 PM
Author: musey
I don't mind if FI sees me in my dress before my aisle-walk. He's actually already seen pictures of me in my dressI can understand women wanting to get that 'look' from their husband-to-be right before heading down the aisle, though!
It makes sense to do all the other photos though.
That''s another thing our photographer mentioned... that most women want a "first look" picture of their husband-to-be, but that that''s REALLY hard to get (especially from a good angle!) during the ceremony.Date: 2/19/2008 11:24:49 PM
Author: sunnygirl
Also something to think about for us...it might be easier to get that ''first look'' picture somewhere that isnt the church?
Date: 2/20/2008 1:06:11 AM
Author: musey
Date: 2/19/2008 11:24:49 PM
Author: sunnygirl
Also something to think about for us...it might be easier to get that ''first look'' picture somewhere that isnt the church?
That''s another thing our photographer mentioned... that most women want a ''first look'' picture of their husband-to-be, but that that''s REALLY hard to get (especially from a good angle!) during the ceremony.
He still gets a ''first look,'' it''s just not in front of all the guests. I like that, but not all people would
Date: 2/19/2008 6:21:51 PM
Author: karasue91
yep. we are doing pictures before the ceremony, and we are doing them together. to me, the whole not seeing each other before the ceremony is a little silly, and since our ceremony isn't until 4pm it's really just about logistics. plus i hate weddings where you have to wait around for the bridal party to get back from taking pictures. our ceremony and reception are at the same place so it's not like there is time when they will be driving between the two locations. also i want fabulous pictures so i don't want them to be rushed, and I want to go to a couple different locales! so we are doing pictures together and with the bridal party before the ceremony, then family pictures during the cocktail hour at the park that is walking distance from our ceremony/reception site.
i also like the idea of seeing each other before the ceremony so we aren't such blubbering messes during it!! i'm sure there will be some crying when we say our vows (we are writing our own), but i'd rather minimize it by taking that first look at each other in private - hugging, kissing, crying, whatever - and then be nice and composed and relaxed for pictures and ceremony.
This is the main reason that we are having pictures taken before. I would be a basket case if I couldn''t see him before we got married. Also, the time issue is huge. A five thirty or six o''clock wedding, outside - you can''t have pictures after the ceremony.Date: 2/20/2008 12:54:49 PM
Author: Tacori E-ring
We took some photos together for the ceremony. I really loved it b/c we got to have a private moment and get out all the emotions so I was calm during the ceremony (I was so worried I would cry through the whole thing) are photographers documented it so it was wonderful. Besides our aisle was SOOOOO long I wouldn''t have been able to see his reaction when he saw me for the first time so this worked out perfectly for us.
Yes, yes, and YES!! Hands down, the best pictures of our wedding were the ''before'' shots taken privately with each other. The photographer has time to compose great pictures, the emotion is evident in the photos between B&G, etc. For us, it really captured what we were feeling, before anyone/anything could intrude. Our photographer did her best ''photoshopping'' on us here, too . . . probably because of the many closeups. THESE are the pictures worthy of hanging as portraits.Date: 2/19/2008 6:15:42 PM
Author:IWantAMilkshake
People do this? Is this not against the whole bride/groom not seeing each other thing, or are they photos that can be done separately, or what?