Miranda
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2006
- Messages
- 4,101
No problem at all Harriet my dear.Date: 5/11/2007 11:14:25 PM
Author: Harriet
Starry,
Sorry for the threadjack, but I''d like to hear about your experience with LM if possible.
Thanks TravelingGal! The secret is to swallow when the picture is being snapped.Date: 5/11/2007 11:36:04 PM
Author: TravelingGal
SO SO SOOOOOOOOOOO stunning (note that I rarely use such an abundance of vowels in a post.)
But I have admit, I actually first noticed what a graceful neck you have! The necklace is worthy of being around it. The purdiest necklace I have seen in a long time!
Hi Sophie! Thanks!Date: 5/11/2007 11:45:05 PM
Author: Sophie
Wow, after looking at this beautiful, classy necklace, I feel starryeyed!!
It is fabulous. Do you think you could take a picture where we see the necklace, as well as how it looks with somesort of shirt/dress neckline?? Just curious to see it at work, lol.
It is totally beautiful and definately a classic...
I fear we both have the same impatient streak.Date: 5/12/2007 9:19:47 AM
Author: starryeyed
No problem at all Harriet my dear.
Funny you should ask because I was wondering the same thing myself yesterday, so I called. Inna informed me that he is working on it and he should know my the end of next week when the ring will be done.
It''s been about 8 weeks. I don''t mind, but in your case, that''s a REALLY long time to not have your e-ring.
I second that! I''m in awe of the STUPENDOUS jewelry collections of the not-yet-engaged and just-engaged girls. I can''t wait to see their collections in, say, TWO years from now!!!!Date: 5/11/2007 2:29:36 AM
Author: decodelighted
I''ll TAKE it ... it''s *just right*. Swoonable for sure. Congrats!
Am I imagining it ... or are the not-yet-engaged or just engaged gals RACKING IN THE JEWELS lately. Us married folks are slackin''.
At least Canuk-Gal is holding down the hitched-up-lady front!!
Egads! Maybe he''ll loan me one in the time being. Ha!Date: 5/12/2007 9:19:47 AM
Author: starryeyed
No problem at all Harriet my dear.
Funny you should ask because I was wondering the same thing myself yesterday, so I called. Inna informed me that he is working on it and he should know my the end of next week when the ring will be done.
It''s been about 8 weeks. I don''t mind, but in your case, that''s a REALLY long time to not have your e-ring.
Thanks dianne!Date: 5/12/2007 9:46:36 AM
Author: dianne
What can I say that hasn''t already been said? What a knockout of a necklace, looks beautiful on you, and love the idea it is adjustable. Sorry you have to send it back for adjustments but you will want it perfect. How will you let it go? I think I would have to keep it a few days to visit. I am so happy for you!!!
Hi Sara! Thanks!Date: 5/12/2007 9:15:12 PM
Author: Cehrabehra
its absolutely gorgeous - the strand and pendant are *perfect* but I agree, the clasps look like lobster claws!!! I think you should seriously consider having a 20' length as well for a sexy low cut length
Hey there KristyDarling!Date: 5/13/2007 11:01:17 AM
Author: KristyDarling
I second that! I'm in awe of the STUPENDOUS jewelry collections of the not-yet-engaged and just-engaged girls. I can't wait to see their collections in, say, TWO years from now!!!!
Thanks Sharon. And thanks again for being a part of this process - I think you were the first person to respond to my first post here on PS!Date: 5/13/2007 11:27:18 AM
Author: canuk-gal
HI:
Starry, good luck with the ''redesign'' of the clasps--I wouldn''t want to part with it either!!!
cheers--Sharon
Doesn't hurt to ask!Date: 5/13/2007 11:04:55 AM
Author: Harriet
Egads! Maybe he'll loan me one in the time being. Ha!
Must be my commanding presence! Kidding!Date: 5/13/2007 11:44:28 AM
Author: Harriet
How can you be a Ma'am with that unlined neck?
I called him. He said that there is no such thing as a slow season, but he did say that if it''s "just a solitaire", it might take a mere 4 weeks.Date: 5/13/2007 11:46:21 AM
Author: starryeyed
Doesn''t hurt to ask!
I thought Widget had a good suggestion for you - I think Isaw it in another thread. She suggested going to him, in his ''slow'' season, so the wait wouldn''t be so bad. So maybe 6 weeks, instead of 10!
4 weeks is better for sure! What did MM say?Date: 5/13/2007 12:03:17 PM
Author: Harriet
I called him. He said that there is no such thing as a slow season, but he did say that if it''s ''just a solitaire'', it might take a mere 4 weeks.Date: 5/13/2007 11:46:21 AM
Author: starryeyed
Doesn''t hurt to ask!
I thought Widget had a good suggestion for you - I think Isaw it in another thread. She suggested going to him, in his ''slow'' season, so the wait wouldn''t be so bad. So maybe 6 weeks, instead of 10!
He can''t take anyone till June, but he didn''t say how long he would need. He''s a one-man show. What am I going to wear for 4 weeks?!Date: 5/13/2007 12:04:53 PM
Author: starryeyed
4 weeks is better for sure! What did MM say?Date: 5/13/2007 12:03:17 PM
Author: Harriet
I called him. He said that there is no such thing as a slow season, but he did say that if it''s ''just a solitaire'', it might take a mere 4 weeks.
Oh man! You''ll feel naked with out it, right?Date: 5/13/2007 12:08:36 PM
Author: Harriet
He can''t take anyone till June, but he didn''t say how long he would need. He''s a one-man show. What am I going to wear for 4 weeks?!Date: 5/13/2007 12:04:53 PM
Author: starryeyed
4 weeks is better for sure! What did MM say?Date: 5/13/2007 12:03:17 PM
Author: Harriet
I called him. He said that there is no such thing as a slow season, but he did say that if it''s ''just a solitaire'', it might take a mere 4 weeks.