shape
carat
color
clarity

Thoughts on these stones ? Need to make a decision :)

Vegasvick

Rough_Rock
Joined
Nov 8, 2020
Messages
36
Getting to that point where its decision time , plus i don't want to keep annoying my amazingly patient and helpful WF rep.

Narrowed down my search on these ACAs and trying to pick one to go with.

Would love to hear some opinions, since this forum is where i was educated and introduced to WF ACAs






TRAY_1.926-1.922-1.84.jpgSBS_1.926-1.922-1.84.jpg
 
All beautiful!

For me...I dont need an F so probably wouldn't want to pay the extra for it. I would probably go with the 1.922 G (for me). Are you
color sensitive at all? If Yes, then definitely the F.

Sorry, I'm not much help!
 
All beautiful!

For me...I dont need an F so probably wouldn't want to pay the extra for it. I would probably go with the 1.922 G (for me). Are you
color sensitive at all? If Yes, then definitely the F.

Sorry, I'm not much help!

That's what I would pick also because I'm not color sensitive.
 
I'm also not color sensitive so take it with a grain of salt. I don't love the cluster of inclusions with the 1.926 - it's visible in all the images (shifted around) depending on diamond orientation. The 1.922 would be my choice.
 
The Gs look like they are fairly high G, very close to the F, so I'd go for either of the G stones. Although, I have to say, those two G stones would make a perfect pair for diamond studs!
 
I would go with the 1.922 G as well - beautifully clean and white (looks very close to the F, and I’m not colour sensitive so that’s good enough for me) and just a tiny bit cheaper than the 1.926 (with no discernible difference in size). Considering how close those Gs are to the F I don’t personally see value in spending 3k extra and sacrificing a tiny bit of size to get the F.
 
If you like icy white, I would get the F but I don't know you would notice the "color" if the G was set and on its own. I prefer the 1.922 G too.
 
Gorgeous choices! I was in your shoes a week ago between F and G ACA. I opted for F. Maybe ask them if the Gs are high, low or solid G. And same for the F. That will help narrow down the color spectrum.


Editing to add link.

Here is the link of my decision-making process:


Hope this helps.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for all the great responses really reaffirms what i was thinking that it is between the 1.84f vs the 1.922g. They are soooo close, do i pay more for mind clean or save some $$$, going to have to really think hard on this one.

Again really appreciate all the responses.
 
I’ll choose the F if the options are only those three, but after looking at WF, I’ll pick this one:

1.908 F VS2

got the size and still at the same price with F VS1.

if I want to go with G color and WF SA didn’t make any remark about the inclusion, after seeing in person WF ACA Si1 that my SA said eyeclean, in person I really can’t see anything. I’ll pick this one because I love love love this specs, the sparkle in the video looks so good and it hit 2ct mark.

 
Last edited:
Thank you for all the great responses really reaffirms what i was thinking that it is between the 1.84f vs the 1.922g. They are soooo close, do i pay more for mind clean or save some $$$, going to have to really think hard on this one.

Again really appreciate all the responses.

Personally, we spent more for F because I don't plan on changing my ring for atleast 10 years. If I knew the stone was "near colorless", and not "colorless", it would bother me every single day. Also, I am color sensitive. Point being, it depends on your criteria. They are all beautiful diamonds. Which one will YOU be happy with every single day? Also, if possible, check out GIA G and F stones in person to find whether you detect color in person.
 
The Gs look like they are fairly high G, very close to the F, so I'd go for either of the G stones. Although, I have to say, those two G stones would make a perfect pair for diamond studs!

Looking to upgrade your earrings @diamondseeker2006 ? You've got my support! :D
 
I would take the 2.068 G
 
I’ll choose the F if the options are only those three, but after looking at WF, I’ll pick this one:

1.908 F VS2

got the size and still at the same price with F VS1.

if I want to go with G color and WF SA didn’t make any remark about the inclusion, after seeing in person WF ACA Si1 that my SA said eyeclean, in person I really can’t see anything. I’ll pick this one because I love love love this specs, the sparkle in the video looks so good and it hit 2ct mark.

the 1.908 was on the list but it was excluded by my rep out due to clarity,

the 2.068 g does look amazingly crisp and sparkly but i think more for a mind over matter thing the cut off is vs2. but damn it makes the other two look cloudy after seeing that vid hmmmmmmmmm..........
 
the 1.908 was on the list but it was excluded by my rep out due to clarity,

the 2.068 g does look amazingly crisp and sparkly but i think more for a mind over matter thing the cut off is vs2. but damn it makes the other two look cloudy after seeing that vid hmmmmmmmmm..........

Lucky we’re talking about WF here!!! You can just take a look that 2.068 and see if you see anything. If it still bothers you the whole return process is extremely easy and stress free, with diamond you got to see it in person.
 
Gorgeous choices! I was in your shoes a week ago between F and G ACA. I opted for F. Maybe ask them if the Gs are high, low or solid G. And same for the F. That will help narrow down the color spectrum.


Editing to add link.

Here is the link of my decision-making process:


Hope this helps.

Beautiful choice they both looked amazing, its just such a tough thing to do in regards to buying things site unseen from pics on the internet. Im such a tactile person and trust in person views that this whole process is so foreign to me, so all i can do is research and get the help of the crew on this board as i feel there is alot more honesty of opinions shared which i appreciate so much. I"m glad you got the stone you loved and that your mind will be satisfied with as well. Congrats
 
Lucky we’re talking about WF here!!! You can just take a look that 2.068 and see if you see anything. If it still bothers you the whole return process is extremely easy and stress free, with diamond you got to see it in person.

sorry off topic , i don't mean to be nosy but i just saw your profile pic and that ring !!!! its insanely beautiful may i ask what setting that is ? and its hugggggee lol
 
Lucky we’re talking about WF here!!! You can just take a look that 2.068 and see if you see anything. If it still bothers you the whole return process is extremely easy and stress free, with diamond you got to see it in person.

I agree with this. Sometimes you just need to see something with your own eyes before making a decision.
 
sorry off topic , i don't mean to be nosy but i just saw your profile pic and that ring !!!! its insanely beautiful may i ask what setting that is ? and its hugggggee lol

You’re not nosy at all, this is what’s this forum is for :D
The center is 2.8 H VS1 CIH and the setting is Emilya Halo from VC. Sadly Victor Canera is refusing to make a ring for competitors stone.
 
You’re not nosy at all, this is what’s this forum is for :D
The center is 2.8 H VS1 CIH and the setting is Emilya Halo from VC. Sadly Victor Canera is refusing to make a ring for competitors stone.

VC has beautiful stuff !!
 
Caveat. I'm color sensitive.
First impression looking at the stones face up, the F looks noticeably whiter. I would go for that.
But knowing WF's inventory, I would choose the one @munchee pointed out, 1.908 VS2. Yeah, that would be the first stone I would look at.

The other three you mentioned would be if I didn't like the 1.908.
 
Caveat. I'm color sensitive.
First impression looking at the stones face up, the F looks noticeably whiter. I would go for that.
But knowing WF's inventory, I would choose the one @munchee pointed out, 1.908 VS2. Yeah, that would be the first stone I would look at.

The other three you mentioned would be if I didn't like the 1.908.

OP said that 1.908 was excluded by her SA due to clarity
 
GET 3 FREE HCA RESULTS JOIN THE FORUM. ASK FOR HELP
Top