phoenixgirl
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2003
- Messages
- 3,390
I don''t support a ban on it. It can be argued that gorging is part of what fowl do in the wild, so it is not a new physiological process to them. But mostly I don''t support a ban because I think that it would invite bans on all sorts of other things, and I don''t want somebody else limiting my choices. Plus, I confess, it''s really tasty.
If there is a way to make money, some company is going to do it. If people find something morally reprehensible, then they should boycott it -- Nestle giving away free formula in Africa, which caused nursing mothers to dry up and then become dependent on the formula, which they then had to buy, something like that -- and send a message to the company.
DH and I have a bunch of vegetarian friends, and I have to confess I just don''t get it. Most of them smoke, which just seems strange, I guess because if you are that concerned for animals you would think you''d be concerned for yourself to the same degree (no offense meant to any smokers -- DH is a smoker and certainly would quit if it were easy). And they wear leather shoes and belts and stuff. But that''s their right, and I guess any way we try to make the world a better place is a step in the right direction.
If it weren''t for the fact that humans are omnivores and that eating each other is the way of the wild, I think I could get on board with vegetarianism. I''ve always wanted to do what makes sense naturally. In college I tried just wearing deoderant, no antiperspirant, because my body sweats for a reason, right? But the result was too stinky. And I also stopped shaving because I decided that our culture just wants us to look prepubescent and that''s gross, and DH stayed with me although he definitely seemed less interested in touching my legs, but then I started teaching and it was too hard to hide, so I gave it up. But I''ve always been one to argue that if something makes sense, who cares what other people think.
If there is a way to make money, some company is going to do it. If people find something morally reprehensible, then they should boycott it -- Nestle giving away free formula in Africa, which caused nursing mothers to dry up and then become dependent on the formula, which they then had to buy, something like that -- and send a message to the company.
DH and I have a bunch of vegetarian friends, and I have to confess I just don''t get it. Most of them smoke, which just seems strange, I guess because if you are that concerned for animals you would think you''d be concerned for yourself to the same degree (no offense meant to any smokers -- DH is a smoker and certainly would quit if it were easy). And they wear leather shoes and belts and stuff. But that''s their right, and I guess any way we try to make the world a better place is a step in the right direction.
If it weren''t for the fact that humans are omnivores and that eating each other is the way of the wild, I think I could get on board with vegetarianism. I''ve always wanted to do what makes sense naturally. In college I tried just wearing deoderant, no antiperspirant, because my body sweats for a reason, right? But the result was too stinky. And I also stopped shaving because I decided that our culture just wants us to look prepubescent and that''s gross, and DH stayed with me although he definitely seemed less interested in touching my legs, but then I started teaching and it was too hard to hide, so I gave it up. But I''ve always been one to argue that if something makes sense, who cares what other people think.