- Joined
- Jan 29, 2012
- Messages
- 6,277
It's a very pretty stone but has it got a lab report confirming it's a Pad? The definition of a pad is that it should be pastel (ie low to medium saturation) and this looks a little bit too saturated to be that - although I know it's your preference. So I guess this depends on whether the $ is for a Pad and whether the lab confirms it as one OR are you just in love with the stone and happy to pay the asking price? If yes, then go for it!
It's interesting because some Pads in museums are highly saturated and I think some would argue their classification. Certainly over the years, there have been numerous debates in the forum about what a pad should look like. It's not a precise science because it's based on colour and we all see things differently. I thought you might be interested to see two interesting definitions of a Pad:
It is clear that the term padparadscha was applied initially to fancy sapphires of a range of colors in stones found in what is now Sri Lanka. If the term is to have merit today, it will have to be limited to those colors historically attributed to padparadscha and found as typical colors in Sri Lanka. It is the GIA’s opinion that this color range should be limited to light to medium tones of pinkish orange to orange-pink hues. Lacking delicacy, the dark brownish orange or even medium brownish orange tones of corundum from East Africa would not qualify under this definition. Deep orangy red sapphires, likewise, would not qualify as fitting the term padparadscha.
– Robert Crowningshield, 1983
and
The core of the LMHC padparadscha definition at the time of writing (2013) is as follows:
Padparadscha sapphire is a variety of corundum from any geographical origin whose colour is a subtle mixture of pinkish orange to orangey pink with pastel tones and low to medium saturations when viewed in standard daylight.
The name 'padparadscha sapphire' shall not be applied in the following cases:
– If the stone has any colour modifier other than pink or orange.
– If the stone has major uneven colour distribution when viewed with the unaided eye and the table up +/- 30°.
– The presence of yellow or orange epigenetic material in fissure(s) affecting the overall colour of the stone.
– If the stone has been treated as described in Information Sheets #2 and #3.
– If the stone has been treated by irradiation.
– If the stone has been dyed, coated, painted, varnished or sputtered.
Richard W. Hughes (extract from Padparadscha Sapphire & The Ownership of Words)
It's a very pretty stone but has it got a lab report confirming it's a Pad? The definition of a pad is that it should be pastel (ie low to medium saturation) and this looks a little bit too saturated to be that - although I know it's your preference. So I guess this depends on whether the $ is for a Pad and whether the lab confirms it as one OR are you just in love with the stone and happy to pay the asking price? If yes, then go for it!
It's interesting because some Pads in museums are highly saturated and I think some would argue their classification. Certainly over the years, there have been numerous debates in the forum about what a pad should look like. It's not a precise science because it's based on colour and we all see things differently. I thought you might be interested to see two interesting definitions of a Pad:
It is clear that the term padparadscha was applied initially to fancy sapphires of a range of colors in stones found in what is now Sri Lanka. If the term is to have merit today, it will have to be limited to those colors historically attributed to padparadscha and found as typical colors in Sri Lanka. It is the GIA’s opinion that this color range should be limited to light to medium tones of pinkish orange to orange-pink hues. Lacking delicacy, the dark brownish orange or even medium brownish orange tones of corundum from East Africa would not qualify under this definition. Deep orangy red sapphires, likewise, would not qualify as fitting the term padparadscha.
– Robert Crowningshield, 1983
and
The core of the LMHC padparadscha definition at the time of writing (2013) is as follows:
Padparadscha sapphire is a variety of corundum from any geographical origin whose colour is a subtle mixture of pinkish orange to orangey pink with pastel tones and low to medium saturations when viewed in standard daylight.
The name 'padparadscha sapphire' shall not be applied in the following cases:
– If the stone has any colour modifier other than pink or orange.
– If the stone has major uneven colour distribution when viewed with the unaided eye and the table up +/- 30°.
– The presence of yellow or orange epigenetic material in fissure(s) affecting the overall colour of the stone.
– If the stone has been treated as described in Information Sheets #2 and #3.
– If the stone has been treated by irradiation.
– If the stone has been dyed, coated, painted, varnished or sputtered.
Richard W. Hughes (extract from Padparadscha Sapphire & The Ownership of Words)
Richard W. Hughes reiterates the LMHC padpadrascha definition in that article, but also says in the next paragraph:
I believe most of these criteria are reasonable. You want the color to be from the stone itself, not a stain in a fissure; similarly, you don't want the stone to be irradiated, dyed or coated.
However where I differ is in the realm of tone and saturation. I do believe that padparadschas can and do have saturations that go well beyond "low to medium." Indeed, the finest (and most expensive) padparadschas I have seen are richly saturated. If they were diamonds, they would certainly be described as vivid.
The only word of caution I have is for you to note that the saturation and hue settings are skewing pinkish orange in the photos - whether they've adjusted the color to enhance these tones or whether the photos were taken in very warm light that cast everything in a pinkish hue, just keep in mind that the stone may likely be less pinkish/saturated in hand.
That said, I love the photos of it!
Can you get more pics/video that is not filtered/enhanced? I think the stone is likely to be less saturated looking irl. Also it looks like it may have half-half extinction, which is fine if you are ok with that.
The photos I shared were screenshots from the vendor’s video.
Here’s a link to the vendors Instagram story: LINK
I‘m not actively looking for a pad right now...I just thought this one was really pretty.
@elle_71125 possibly a silly suggestion and you may have already done this, but if this seller is well known to the forum, it may be worth seeing how previous stones have compared to the selling images.
After a break from all things gem/jewellery for a couple of years, I was surprised when I looked at Instagram recently to see the number of sellers who seem to have the most vivid/saturated gemstones that a few years ago would have been more difficult to find. I'm not sure if this is because newer phones are changing how gemstones look OR whether some sellers are just becoming more adapt at making gemstones look better OR if there are indeed more lovely gemstones on the market!
I surely doubt that there are more beautifully saturated gems on the market. I’ve seen so many gems on Instagram that you just know will look nothing like that in real life. Personally, I’ve never understood that concept because you may get someone to buy from you once but they won’t be coming back for more.
It’s nice to see you back in action btw.
With any orange toned sapphires, be sure to have the stone checked for beryllium diffusion (at a major lab like AGL or GIA). The stone may still be beautiful, but it greatly affects the value.