So Gary, in point 2 you are contradicting most people. You actually look for a strong flour to go with the colourless range ?Date: 10/12/2006 8:01:23 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
1. ther nearer you get to a dealers market the more likely you will get burned.
2. I would not buy Drena a big diamond with less than strong blue fluoro in D-F
3. I saw 3 cloudy diamonds this year. I see about 500 diamonds a week.
I''ve seen one that quite literally looked to be in a *fog* - it wasn''t milky or oily - and it wasn''t inclusions - the aura hung around on top of or radiated out of the stone in this foggy halo LOL That was a VERY extreme case though, I have faint flour and in the brightest of bright sunlights I can see it a little... I''d *love* med flour.Date: 10/12/2006 6:14:49 AM
Author: lienTN
I''ve seen a couple of stones E, F colour with medium flourescence and indeed they look very cloudy, pretty yuk! sorry. On the other hand, my G colour earrings have medium and strong flouro and both look very white for their colour (almost like an F or better). I believe this is in accordance with what the experts say, ie. when buying colourless, stay away from fluoro, but for G onwards, it can be a good thing. Can you view the stone before you buy and see if it has this milky / cloudy appearance?
I was given info on a stone that I would have LOVED to buy but it was out of my price range (they wouldn''t even tell me by how much LOL) 2.53 is F-VS1 Very Strong Blue, 55% table, 8.54x7.06x4.98mm OMC ---- I would have LOVED to get my hands on that stone!!!!!! Not sure where the carat weight was hiding since mine is a half mm wider and a full mm longer but only .18 larger LOL But who cares! I bet that was one hell of an OMC ::sigh:: I seriously told vendors I wanted a J or D strong LOL No middle ground for me!!!Date: 10/12/2006 9:47:50 AM
Author: just_looking!
I''d jump at the chance!
My favourite is D with medium or strong blue fluorescence. So far I have this combo in a solitaire pendant and there are new earring studs waiting for me for my wedding anniversary on the 15th.
I also like the fact that others don''t want fluor in their D''s so I get a better price. I just wish there were more of them around!!
Not to ignore the original post, but..Date: 10/12/2006 10:04:22 AM
Author: Kaleigh
Of course I would. As long as it wasn''t milky or cloudy. My ering stone is 2.36 E VVS2 and has medium blue. My asscher is an E VS1 with strong blue. It is clear as day. And my oval that I am getting today has medium blue. So I actually prefer it.
oh I can relte to this LOL I start remembering my stone lie a piece of glass then when I go in I feel this glee and wheeeee it''s so sparkley!!!! lol!Date: 10/12/2006 2:22:12 PM
Author: gail013
I am glad to hear this, as I am looking at a 3.5 carat RB, M in color, ideal cut, but with strong blue fl. I thought it was quite beautiful . The stone actually faces up quite white, and seems to have alot of fire. I am also having a wax made, and was just told today it is ready for me to look at, but I can''t get there until proably Monday! The suspense! I''m a little afraid that when I go back the stone won''t look as lovely. I can tell you though, that if fl. does''t bother you, you can save quite a bit of money!
Yep, me too. My e-ring has a D with medium blue and the color is amazing. The appraiser said it looked even whiter/crisper than a D usually does.Date: 10/12/2006 8:25:56 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
I take the diamond as oit is - a top color that looks whiter than white in daylight is my kinda diamond.
Gosh Garry you''re right, I haven''t mispelled it in this thread, but know I have in others. I am going to write it down on a flash card and put it next to my computer. Oh and while I''m at it isn''t it :Date: 10/13/2006 12:31:50 AM
Author: Garry H (Cut Nut)
Many of you are using very bad spelling (ha ha - coming from me - the worst in the world!!!)
The word is Fluorescence and the abbrieviation has the U before the O - fluoro - that''s the word.
So SKR - let us know what you gunna do!!!