blinkydoll
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
- Messages
- 957
I.LOVE.THIS.RING!!! CONGRATULATIONS AJ!!!!Date: 7/2/2009 8:59:08 AM
Author: arjunajane
And this is supposed to an M, lol!
Date: 7/2/2009 10:40:06 AM
Author: fatafelice
SWOON!!!
That is one gorgeous cushion! And it reminds me a lot of my own chunky baby.
What I want to know is, wher the h-e-double-hockey-sticks was GOG when I spent months and months trying to find an antique-style stone?!?!Oh, well, at least now I know where to go for an upgrade!
Wear that beauty in good health! The great thing about chunky cushions is that they are always coming up with new tricks.
Date: 7/2/2009 10:59:11 AM
Author: gemgirl
AJ, it''s a beautiful beautiful stone, and I love the description of the color - vintage lace, although I''ve got to say, no one would ever believe that she''s an M. And using your old Legato setting? I think it looks perfect and to tell you the truth? I don''t know that I''d ever take her out of that mounting. The scallops on the sides of the Legato just lends itself to the antique-y nature of the cut and color of your stone. That stone actually looks like it belongs in that mounting. I think she''s home!
I just had a bout of Carlin-esque humor run through my head (''ya know ''jumbo shrimp'', ''military intelligence?) LOL! You have a new antique! Quite an oxymoron but absolutely true. It''s gorgeous. Wear it in the best of health and happiness.
Just a word about the times we''ve been living in.... Honey, you don''t have to explain to anyone. Some of us, my house included, were hit very hard by the downturn on our economy that started at the end of last summer, and truth be told, I sold a small mountain of gold jewelry and my husband sold a load of tackle on Ebay to make some extra money for us. But we do what we have to do for our households to be OK. You didn''t downgrade, you just changed the shape of your stone and who knows? My guess is in years to come, you''ll be growing that diamond to a larger size. Don''t think of this in a negative way. You''ve got one gorgeous new rock on your finger! That''s just my two cents.
More photos please!
AJ,Date: 7/2/2009 1:12:57 PM
Author: Chrono
Here you go:
Face up surface area of RB: 38.19 mm square
Face up surface area of OMC: 37.22 mm square
It looks like the difference is very tiny, only 1 mm square, which I attribute to the roundedness of the RB and pokey corners of the OMC. I guess it would make sense that the OMC would be shallower because it has less carat weight too? Well, I’m not complaining about how much shallower these OMCs are compared to the true OMC antiques that can have up to 80% depths!
I''m keeping my fingers crossed for you.Date: 7/3/2009 5:39:37 AM
Author: arjunajane
I don''t want to jinx it by spilling just yet, but a really good oppurtunity has come my way this past week..I''ll know by the end of July if this story has an (even more) happy ending - and I may just put in first request for PS dust