- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 25,226
I think the difference between Paraiba and other gems is that it's so expensive for fine qualities, and people want to keep the Paraiba name isolated to the locale that the best quality came from. These other gems are nowhere near as valuable per carat like Danburite. There are arguments on both sides. I see where you're coming from.Date: 6/26/2010 8:57:44 PM
Author: morecarats
Date: 6/25/2010 9:51:40 PM
Author: VapidLapid
I like to take the collecting of stones from localites they are named after to another level I call Expatriate Gems. This would be examples of stones named for one place but found in another. Thus danburite from mogok, goshenite from africa, californiaite from italy, vesuvianite from california, sinhalite from burma, labradorite from finland....
Mineralogists call the location where a mineral was first found the 'type location.' But even when a mineral is named after the type location, almost everyone knows that the mineral is not identified with the type location -- specimens will probably occur elsewhere (not yet true for tanzanite, however). Apparently there is no more goshenite from Goshen, MA or danburite from Danbury, CT. All the supply comes from elsewhere.
Even though this point seems obvious, it appears to have been lost during the debate about paraiba tourmaline. There was an article in Colored Stone a few years ago, where the editor argued passionately that you couldn't have paraiba tourmaline from Mozambique, since the very name indicates that it only comes from Paraiba, Brazil. Is it any wonder the magazine went out of business? Here's a link to the article:
http://www.colored-stone.com/stories/may08/paraiba.cfm
Bixbite and benitoite are rather expensive in larger sizes, but they continue to be one source gems.