- Joined
- Apr 30, 2005
- Messages
- 33,993
Autumnovember said:kenny said:MonkeyPie said:The whole "sex is better if you are uncut" thing is BS for one simple reason - unless you have experienced it BOTH WAYS you cannot legitimately say that.
My SO was circumcised a couple years ago at age 40.
He reports much less sensation.
Sample size: 1 - but there it is.
Was it a personal choice or medical? Don't have to share if you're not comfortable..
I'm not comfortable sharing; I feel bad enough revealing what I have.
I just did so in response to that BS comment. - PLUS I'll add it's from a woman.
I get lots of criticism here on PS when talking about certain woman-sensitive subjects so . . .
I'm just saying that that can go both ways.
I still suspect one of the origins of male and female circumcision is pious prudes wanting to reduce sexual pleasure in others; it's about control.
Over time it just became tradition ... wanting the son to look like dad.
I am not disputing the medical evidence.
Both just coexist AFAIC.