- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 20,128
See I see a distinct taper in the center near the bezel rounds compared to the flowers at the top.In general it’s much better. He really did a nice job tweaking it.
There’s only one thing that still catches my eye. The shape of the halo. In the original, the thickness of the halo tapers nicely towards the middle and then thickens at the ends; yours appears to be close to uniform in size. I mocked a comparison collage for you to hopefully see what I’m talking about.
Again, it’s slight, but I’m very detailed oriented so I noticed it.
You may want to consider shrinking the entire halo mm size as well. It appears to be roughly the same size as the original but the original has a larger center stone; shrinking the halo would keep the same aesthetic balance.
In general it’s much better. He really did a nice job tweaking it.
There’s only one thing that still catches my eye. The shape of the halo. In the original, the thickness of the halo tapers nicely towards the middle and then thickens at the ends; yours appears to be close to uniform in size. I mocked a comparison collage for you to hopefully see what I’m talking about.
Again, it’s slight, but I’m very detailed oriented so I noticed it.
You may want to consider shrinking the entire halo mm size as well. It appears to be roughly the same size as the original but the original has a larger center stone; shrinking the halo would keep the same aesthetic balance.
See I see a distinct taper in the center near the bezel rounds compared to the flowers at the top.
Could you share a pic of the current version?So my ring has been finished for a week but I'm holding things up by not making a decision. :roll
Its very gold which is what I asked for and it looks beautiful BUT David has asked whether I would like it to be oxidised.
Against
It takes away from the richness of the yellow gold. Two of my inspiration rings were all about the gold with rich centre stones and I love that look
For
It will look antique as it is a replica that's not a bad idea
It will highlight the detailing
I need to decide as I'm in the UK.
What do you think?
David has asked whether I would like it to be oxidised.
Have you considered matte gold rather than oxidised? I think it would be a good medium between the two options
I'd go with a very light oxidation. It will help the details pop. You might also consider strategic matte, not all over. More like painting to help show the details.
His lighting is also striking high. My gold rig I got from him looked stupid yellow in the photos he sent me. Would you be able to ship it to you to see it?
Thanks the compliment by the way too bad I will have to wait until at least Xmas before I am allowed it!The ring looks fabulous!
@ceg that puts me in a quandary. I was set on oxidation and I the like cvb rings with it. I know what you are saying though I wonder with the lightest touch of it might be ok. I do like patina in my jewelery I always have to have bracelets made smaller and I always prefer them in their dirty state beforehand. Do you like everything immaculate?
I am pretty weird about patina on metals. I use an antique set of sterling for nicer dinners and I polish off the patina -blasphemy for antique sterling! I realize the details show more but I just don't care for the black. Very, very light might be ok. Lol, don't ask me how I know but ammonia will take it off if you don't like it!!!!
Well can we first say he did an amazing job on this because he really did. Much better than any other replica version I’ve seen attempted
Are you wearing it alone or with a band?
I feel like I want it oxidized
I am glad you are considering very light oxidation! I had an 18k carved band from CVB and I felt that it would really help show the details of the design better, but I do not like dark oxidation at all. I'd get the lightest amount possible. I agree with you that matte is not right for this design. Your ring is gorgeous! I have that antique ring pic saved because I liked it a lot, too!