legaleagle84
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
- Messages
- 13
Hi everyone!
I am getting a 2 carat 6 prong Tiffany style set engagement ring and I am trying to choose a wedding band. I think I am stuck because I looked at rings for way too long over the last few weeks and I would be so grateful for objective fresh eyes to give me some feedback. I read some other threads on similar topics and they were so helpful! I think I narrowed it down to 5 point / 7 point / 10 point diamonds on a half eternity type wedding band (ie 9 or 10 diamonds).
The band on my engagement ring is 2.2 mm wide which is a touch more delicate than the classic 2.5 mm Tiffany set 6 prong. Otherwise the setting looks very close to the Tiffany setting.
I love the 10 point diamonds side by side which creates a “wall of diamonds” view beside the 2 carat e-ring. But because a 10 pt diamond set in a prong setting (3.5 mm wide) is much wider than 2.2 mm wide e-ring , I am wondering if it looks off or unsymmetrical beside the setting of the 2 carat e-ring? On the flip side; the 2 carat stone can handle 10 pointers!
The attached pictures are of the 5 pointer/ 7 pointer / 10 pointer demo rings beside a 2 carat diamond set in a Tiffany style setting.
The diamonds on the top pictured wedding bands have individual prongs. I saw a shared prong ring that looks very similar on James Allen for almost half the cost. Is it really that risky to get a shared prong setting? The jewellery store I am working with keep telling me over time people lose diamonds on the shared prong setting and say they are not durable.
www.jamesallen.com
I’m not sure why James Allen or blue Nile doesn’t have this low profile individual prong style wedding band....
Questions:
1. Is 3.5 mm wide 1 carat wedding band (ie 10 x 0.10 ct diamonds) look too wide or disproportionate beside the 2.2 mm wide ering setting?
2. If I am going lower than 10 pointer, should I go 5 pts or 7 pts?
3. I looked at the Tiffany embrace wedding band which is more of a bezel type setting which is completely different than the prong setting I’ve been looking at which has more of a flat edge around the diamonds: Should I go Tiffany Embrace type band or prong set? I attached the Tiffany Embrace photo. (I know completely different! But I like both! Diamond size questions would apply to both!).
Also, the e-ring design was modified so the wedding band will sit flush with the engagement ring which was a huge ordeal and and we had to go custom. I’m surprised more people aren’t talking about why there is no 6 prong solitaire setting available that will sit flush with a wedding band!
Finally, the ring pictures I am attaching were taken with an in stock ring at the jeweller and my diamond hasn’t been set yet so I can ask for a wider ering band since I’m already paying extra to go custom. I don’t want too much bulk on my hands as I plan on daily wear
and I feared that the wider the bands the bulkier it will feel... which might increase the likelihood that I might be tempted to take them off throughout the day... and I fear losing them so I don’t want them to feel like they are in the way. I have a desk/computer based job. This is why I leaned toward a more delicate band on e-ring.
Sorry for the long post! From what I have read, some of you have had your rings for a while and even redesigned/ reset them so tried/tested/true opinions are valuable! I’ve never worn any rings on a daily basis before so my assumptions are based entirely on theory here!
I am getting a 2 carat 6 prong Tiffany style set engagement ring and I am trying to choose a wedding band. I think I am stuck because I looked at rings for way too long over the last few weeks and I would be so grateful for objective fresh eyes to give me some feedback. I read some other threads on similar topics and they were so helpful! I think I narrowed it down to 5 point / 7 point / 10 point diamonds on a half eternity type wedding band (ie 9 or 10 diamonds).
The band on my engagement ring is 2.2 mm wide which is a touch more delicate than the classic 2.5 mm Tiffany set 6 prong. Otherwise the setting looks very close to the Tiffany setting.
I love the 10 point diamonds side by side which creates a “wall of diamonds” view beside the 2 carat e-ring. But because a 10 pt diamond set in a prong setting (3.5 mm wide) is much wider than 2.2 mm wide e-ring , I am wondering if it looks off or unsymmetrical beside the setting of the 2 carat e-ring? On the flip side; the 2 carat stone can handle 10 pointers!
The attached pictures are of the 5 pointer/ 7 pointer / 10 pointer demo rings beside a 2 carat diamond set in a Tiffany style setting.
The diamonds on the top pictured wedding bands have individual prongs. I saw a shared prong ring that looks very similar on James Allen for almost half the cost. Is it really that risky to get a shared prong setting? The jewellery store I am working with keep telling me over time people lose diamonds on the shared prong setting and say they are not durable.

Platinum Nine Stone Shared Prong Contour Diamond Ring (1.00 CTW - F-G / VS1-VS2)-16002p4a
Open shared prongs contour the diamonds to better showcase their unmatched beauty. A scalloped setting provides protection while allowing more light to shine through the diamond for added sparkle. This anniversary ring is elegant and timeless.
I’m not sure why James Allen or blue Nile doesn’t have this low profile individual prong style wedding band....
Questions:
1. Is 3.5 mm wide 1 carat wedding band (ie 10 x 0.10 ct diamonds) look too wide or disproportionate beside the 2.2 mm wide ering setting?
2. If I am going lower than 10 pointer, should I go 5 pts or 7 pts?
3. I looked at the Tiffany embrace wedding band which is more of a bezel type setting which is completely different than the prong setting I’ve been looking at which has more of a flat edge around the diamonds: Should I go Tiffany Embrace type band or prong set? I attached the Tiffany Embrace photo. (I know completely different! But I like both! Diamond size questions would apply to both!).
Also, the e-ring design was modified so the wedding band will sit flush with the engagement ring which was a huge ordeal and and we had to go custom. I’m surprised more people aren’t talking about why there is no 6 prong solitaire setting available that will sit flush with a wedding band!
Finally, the ring pictures I am attaching were taken with an in stock ring at the jeweller and my diamond hasn’t been set yet so I can ask for a wider ering band since I’m already paying extra to go custom. I don’t want too much bulk on my hands as I plan on daily wear

Sorry for the long post! From what I have read, some of you have had your rings for a while and even redesigned/ reset them so tried/tested/true opinions are valuable! I’ve never worn any rings on a daily basis before so my assumptions are based entirely on theory here!
Attachments
-
574C8A16-284D-4DFB-AF7B-032D4B95630F.jpeg184.3 KB · Views: 170
-
7783CC12-A371-4296-B83F-10A6D742B588.jpeg187.4 KB · Views: 153
-
FE3900AE-1FB6-47C8-B186-20E046EED7CB.jpeg177.1 KB · Views: 156
-
13C3AD7A-5420-4A41-974F-9E16A5735E3C.jpeg161.9 KB · Views: 163
-
2440778F-8571-420A-BA43-42AEE8D2E76E.jpeg271.8 KB · Views: 154
-
61F7442C-8D13-4E96-93F9-5D8B3A3D50DC.jpeg128 KB · Views: 136
-
D4A95EA1-8943-487B-B443-A6F10DF1B4EB.png265.8 KB · Views: 117
-
520B2611-3BEF-4EE5-A8BE-EBDF8B73B3AD.jpeg209.2 KB · Views: 120
-
937BE214-F525-42AF-9639-96E937DF9ADE.jpeg62.4 KB · Views: 143