- Joined
- Apr 21, 2010
- Messages
- 5,587
Re: Got a great JW sapphire, let's find the perfect setting!
This is so exciting - and even though the thrill is purely vicarious I am so enjoying this!
It seems to me like JBEG is kind of basing their design on the MC2 blue sapphire w/pear side stones design, and Greenlake is basing their design mostly on the MC2 yellow-gold and green sapphire (is it?) ring.
For me, I like the proportions JBEG came up with for the pears; I definitely don't think you should go any smaller and I'm not sure I agree that fatter pears would look better -- your GF has very small fingers and also doesn't want a biggish ring - I think if the pears went bigger the finger coverage would be ginormous for a size 4.5. (But I'm just guessing and imagining, who can tell at this stage?)
For the Greenlake concepts, at this point I'm loving #A-5 and also #D - both of those suggest the elements I myself favor from the original MC2 ring, and they also have a really nice flow to them (at least on paper / monitor). Both of these rings to me are beautiful and seem rather timeless in design so they should withstands trends and fashions while always looking current.
I'm slightly favoring the Greenlake rings only because I personally prefer three-stone rings to be RHR or anniversary rings and not so much as engagement rings but I definitely love a blue sapphire with diamond pears...
Steve, it's great you now have several gorgeous designs to work with!
This is so exciting - and even though the thrill is purely vicarious I am so enjoying this!
It seems to me like JBEG is kind of basing their design on the MC2 blue sapphire w/pear side stones design, and Greenlake is basing their design mostly on the MC2 yellow-gold and green sapphire (is it?) ring.
For me, I like the proportions JBEG came up with for the pears; I definitely don't think you should go any smaller and I'm not sure I agree that fatter pears would look better -- your GF has very small fingers and also doesn't want a biggish ring - I think if the pears went bigger the finger coverage would be ginormous for a size 4.5. (But I'm just guessing and imagining, who can tell at this stage?)
For the Greenlake concepts, at this point I'm loving #A-5 and also #D - both of those suggest the elements I myself favor from the original MC2 ring, and they also have a really nice flow to them (at least on paper / monitor). Both of these rings to me are beautiful and seem rather timeless in design so they should withstands trends and fashions while always looking current.
I'm slightly favoring the Greenlake rings only because I personally prefer three-stone rings to be RHR or anniversary rings and not so much as engagement rings but I definitely love a blue sapphire with diamond pears...
Steve, it's great you now have several gorgeous designs to work with!