Girl from Mars
Rough_Rock
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2008
- Messages
- 21
Sorry, double post!Date: 8/29/2009 10:34:56 PM
Author: loriken214
My pink tourmaline by Gene.
Lori
Here are a few examples of all of the asschers I have. I don''t have a vendor photo for my cinnamon tourmaline, because it was a surprise to me.Date: 8/29/2009 3:44:57 AM
Author: arjunajane
Date: 8/28/2009 8:27:23 AM
Author: LaurenThePartier
AJ, have you seen enough Asscher coloured stones to know which cuitter you''re leaning toward? I really think they all have their own styles.
I haven''t seen a JW (more classic RA style) or a BB in person (but I''m getting in line), but I think my Gary Braun Asschers edge out my Peter Torracas by just a hair. I want a Gene Asscher too!
As for colours, aqua could hit what you need, and tourmaline may take you quite some time to find the appropriate rough. I have a green tourmaline with blue on the B axis, but the C axis is closed so it''s quite dark, and the deep cut didn''t help anything. I love it, though, because of the cut and how it behaves in the sun.
I can''t wait to see what you decide on!
Heya Lauren,
thanks for lending your advice!
I have looked through as many threads on here as I could find, but I can''t claim to have seen any in person.
I *think* I can tell the difference between the RA''s and the generic cut ones, but sometimes it''s difficult in non-vendor pics.
Am I correct that Gene and Jeff W cut RA style ones, and the others do more generic styles?
I must admit, from the photos I''ve seen I do prefer the look of the symmetry/windmills on Gene''s and JW''s - but perhaps that just because I haven''t seen vendor photos for the other cutters...Do you by chance have a photo from Gary of your tourm asscher you could share?
Barry doesn''t seem to have what I''m after; Gary is very quick to reply but doesn''t have any rough atm; and I''ve emailed Gene about his blue-green tourmaline but not heard back as yet..
To answer your question, I would likely be happy with something from any of the above (I think!).
trying once more for a pic of Red Faery''s one from Gene..
Date: 8/29/2009 9:19:23 AM
Author: Jeffrey Hunt
Hi,
Don''t forget Roger Dery at http://www.spectralgems.net/ He recently cut an astounding Asscher for me. Take a look at his website, but don''t hesitate to contact him either he has many more gems than what is listed on his site.
You might also try Lisa Elser at http://www.custom-cutgems.com/
Regards,
Jeff
AJ,Date: 8/30/2009 12:18:49 AM
Author: arjunajane
Wow, thankyou everyone for sharing your photos, I really appreciate it and this is a great help!
Kismet, thanks hon for the link and photos.
Mochi, you do have some collection! I love all of yours, but agree that the ones from Gene really look extra nice.
Gailey, as you know that gem was one of the first that drew me over to the darkside of CS, lol!
Lori, all of yours are incredible, but the first three really stand out. That JW peridot is gorgeousLori, quick question - how do you find Barry''s asscher-style compared to the more traditional RA styles from Gene etc? It''s a lil tilted in that pic, but the steps and windmills still look nice to me. Were you happy with it? And do you have a preference, seeing as you have one from nearly every cutter! Cheers.
Hi girl from mars - is that beauty yours?
Thanks everyone for your contributions!
Date: 8/31/2009 8:50:12 AM
Author: Chrono
Hi AJ,
Welcome to the asscher craze. Since you asked for a close up of a Jeff White asscher, here’s his picture of a pink spinel asscher.
Yes, AJ. It’s mine. I’m glad you like it.
Which dilemma are you asking about? Tying to pick one asscher design over another? I would say it depends on the size of the stone and the type of stone selected. For something dispersive like a garnet or spinel, the traditional RA is well suited. For something with low dispersion like aquamarine or tourmaline, the extra facets added will make it more interesting and sparkly. For a smaller stone, the modified asscher is good because it won’t be overly deep (hence too small face up) and also the gives a bigger step appearance although it sacrifices the windmills in the process.
As for colour accuracy, you can see it in my picture above. It doesn’t get quite as pink as Jeff''s picture in person even though the saturation is spot on – it likes to show a slight lavender tint as shown in my picture.
Date: 8/31/2009 11:03:32 AM
Author: Chrono
Yes, AJ. It’s mine. I’m glad you like it.
Which dilemma are you asking about? Tying to pick one asscher design over another? I would say it depends on the size of the stone and the type of stone selected. For something dispersive like a garnet or spinel, the traditional RA is well suited. For something with low dispersion like aquamarine or tourmaline, the extra facets added will make it more interesting and sparkly. For a smaller stone, the modified asscher is good because it won’t be overly deep (hence too small face up) and also the gives a bigger step appearance although it sacrifices the windmills in the process.
As for colour accuracy, you can see it in my picture above. It doesn’t get quite as pink as Jeff''s picture in person even though the saturation is spot on – it likes to show a slight lavender tint as shown in my picture.
Date: 8/31/2009 11:12:17 AM
Author: Ellen
Hey aj, if it''s the color you''re wanting more than the cut, I''d go for color now. You can always get an Asscher cut down the road if you want.
Just my cheap (.02) opinion.