TravelingGal
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2004
- Messages
- 17,193
Sounds to me like he is not Hungry. A hungry baby will suck.Date: 4/7/2010 11:24:03 AM
Author: Mara
though I should be able to put him on the boob once more a day but he''s sooo lazy I know he just doesn''t get enough and stimulation does not help so it is sitting there for like 30-40 min with him staring around daydreaming and occasionally sucking, so I would hate having to pump after that ANYWAY. It would be diff if he was a good eater on the boob, I would not mind feeding him more often, it would be super easy.
That makes me so happy to hear Mandy! Your boys are so adorable and I am always happy to hear when twin mamas get a good break.Date: 4/8/2010 12:47:02 PM
Author: Mandarine
ditto, ditto, ditto TG, Janine and Jas!!!
TGal, Thank you!!! I am so rested today!!! I honestly opened my eyes at 6am and that was the first time I saw the clock since 10:30pm! I hope they keep it up!!!!!!!!!!
So thanks everyone for giving kudos to the little dudes, they deserved them!
I wish I had better answers to your question, and the time to address this better. (DH has the kids for another 3 minutes). I don''t necessarily feel guilty as much as I feel negatively judged for certain informed choices I made re: feeding my child...is it that I feel sometimes people think it''s stupidity on my part? Or, worse, informed negligence? For me, it was a difficult decision to know I was giving my kids "second best" and not one made lightly.Date: 4/8/2010 1:00:27 PM
Author: cara
OK Ok, I should probably stick to my thread like janine...
but how is saying that there are risks associated with formula any different than saying there are risks associated with c-sections? There are many women that NEED a c-section cause v-birth is not going well and it sure as heck beats the alternative (letting baby stay in there), just as for many women breastfeeding is not going well and formula feeding sure beats the alternative (no food). Many other women choose c-sections or formula feeding for less dire reasons but because they think it is best for them and their baby balancing all the medical, health and other considerations. I don''t think they should be made to feel guilty for their choice but is it really necessary to insist that there are *no risks* associated with one choice or the other, or forbid saying there are risks or downsides to a particular choice just to keep people from feeling guilty?
In other words, if breast is best, how are you allowed to support that statement in a way describes the actual benefits of breast feeding over formula? No one thinks formula is a worse choice than starvation, but mothers are human and subject to advertisements and marketing and sometimes make choices that they think are in the best interests of their family but without all the education or support that would be useful to them. Take the study that shows free formula in the hospital reduces breastfeeding rates - how else to counter the advertising effects and convenience of a free formula can when your breast hurts and your baby is crying than education on the benefits of breastfeeding over formula?
Which is not to say that I don''t think that women need support for both breastfeeding and formula feeding when that is the right choice for them. No one should be made to feel guilty over how they end up feeding their child, I guess its just a hard line to walk sometimes if you also want to have a more substantial discussion.
ETA: Okay, I submitted this well after I wrote it, and reading all the interim posts its clear that women DO feel guilty when risks are mentioned with FF. I just want to make clear my questions above are not rhetorical then - how do you have a conversation on the topic that is not just lip service to ''breast is best'' without making people that don''t breastfeed for whatever reason feel guilty? Or is it like politics and religion at dinner parties - best avoid it?
Date: 4/8/2010 12:02:00 PM
Author: janinegirly
I have yet to see any real proof of increased intelligence and in terms of increased immunity-that one is not a slam dunk either. In fact a recent study claimed that immunity is actually more likely to be determined in utereo in last stages of pregnancy (i.e. mother''s immunity a bigger factor)! So you can always find a study to suit your opnion.
I'll have a look--I heard it on the radio in the morning (probably a few months back). Same way I heard about this more recent study (which seems to have gotten more press).Date: 4/8/2010 2:45:36 PM
Author: E B
Date: 4/8/2010 12:02:00 PM
Author: janinegirly
I have yet to see any real proof of increased intelligence and in terms of increased immunity-that one is not a slam dunk either. In fact a recent study claimed that immunity is actually more likely to be determined in utereo in last stages of pregnancy (i.e. mother's immunity a bigger factor)! So you can always find a study to suit your opnion.
janine- If you're still reading, do you have a link to the study you mentioned above?
And I agree with that. Plus it has a much catchier ring than "breast is better."Date: 4/8/2010 2:34:55 PM
Author: E B
Well stated, cara.
When I say ''breast is best,'' it certainly isn''t to make moms who formula feed feel guilty. But if we''re coming from an educational standpoint, it''s a correct statement. It doesn''t, however, mean that formula is ''the worst'' choice by any means. As I said before, it''s a perfectly acceptable alternative.
The ''Breast is Best'' campaign is simply meant to inform women of the power of breast milk. It''s to get women to want to breastfeed, to TRY to breastfeed, even if it''s just to provide your baby with colostrum the first few days of life. It''s meant to help women power through some of the more solvable issues- nipple cracking, pain, issues with uneven supply. They''re supposed to be a helpful few words.
All kinds of parenting decisions come under scrutiny from one group/side or another, but as long as we know we''re doing the best we can for our children, that''s all that matters. I''ve had to deal with judgment about certain choices I''ve made for my son, but I tell myself that I made the best decision I could at the time. As many of you have said, we''re only human, and we''re doing the best we can.
KimberlyH- Henry was practically attached to my breast for the first several weeks. When he wasn''t, he was sleeping. I remember not being able to do much but read or watch TV because I was being held hostage by a moody little man. My MIL (former LC), Henry''s pediatrician (LC) and Henry''s nurse (LC) all assured me that as long as his latch was good and he was gaining weight, this was normal. Jane''s helping you build one heck of a supply.
Not sure if you really wanted an answer here, but I''ll bite....I CHOSE not to because eventhough I could have really tried and certainly am aware of its benefits, it just wasn''t something I could see myself committing to. I just didn''t see BFing fitting into my lifestyle. If that makes me selfish/stupid/bad mommy/whatever...than so be it. It''s my choice, my son, my decision. And frankly (and this is not directed at you specifically) I''m OVER the mommy guilt thing and people who attempt to play on a mother''s sensitivities to make them feel bad. I *know* I''m a great mom and love my son more than anything (and more than I ever could have imagined). Not BFing doesn''t negate that.Date: 4/8/2010 1:49:39 PM
Author: NovemberBride
These posts on BF vs. FF are so timely for me. I intended to EBF for a year and I really did not want to supplement with formula. However, I went back to work at 12 weeks and since then my supply has slowly dropped to the point where pumping 3 times a day at work for 20 min. each was only yielding me 7-10 oz per day, and Olivia was eating 12-15 at daycare each day. Since I can''t really devote more time than that to pumping - I do have to work, which involves attending meetings without flanges stuck to my chest, I decided to supplement with formula. I felt guilty about it, but I knew I needed to do it. FWIW, I tried fenugreek (made both baby and me super-gassy). I looked into Reglan, but that stuff has some nasty side effects (and that''s coming from someone who worked for the pharmaceutical industry and is generally pro-pharmaceuticals). My guilt was made worse by the fact that Olivia has a milk protein allergy and developed a terrible rash and projectile vomited up every bottle of formula. We have now solved that problem by using a hypoallergenic problem, but I do feel guilty because I know she didn''t have the problem with bf''ing.
I''ll admit that I do judge moms who don''t even try to breastfeed for superficial reasons like not wanting their boobs to sag - I do believe breast is best and if you can do it, why wouldn''t you? If you tried and couldn''t or couldn''t keep up it is a different story in my opinion (just my opinion, not saying it is right or wrong). I think it is nearly impossible to be a working mom in the US and EBF for a year. I don''t know anyone who has done it - most women''s supply dwindles with pumping and even if it doesn''t dwindle, pumping is awful and finding the time to do it at work is next to impossible.