LadyAmythyst69
Brilliant_Rock
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2007
- Messages
- 1,488
I actually think they do talk about it and match or co-ordinate on purpose. They''ve done it too many times for it to be an accident. I can totally picture the girly phone calls...Date: 12/4/2007 6:15:26 PM
Author: DiamanteBlu
Do you think they spoke before leaving the house that morning? The matching tops threw me for a loop for a second! LOL!
ETA: I didn''t see the pics on the previous page before posting!
These are real. I have forgotten the designer, but the boutique jewelry store, where my rings were purchased, has a display of them in both YG and WG. The owner always has one on. I think cost is around $2K.Date: 11/18/2007 3:10:14 AM
Author: LadyAmythyst69
Sarah was wearing a diamond encrusted ''key'' pendant that I haven''t seen before. Hard to tell if it is real or costume jewelry.
Thanks Holly. It''s so hard to tell with Sarah what is real or costume. Her jewelry since the divorce is pretty slim and she borrows alot. So it''s hard to tell if she owns the piece, if it''s borrowed etc.Date: 12/5/2007 6:51:58 PM
Author: HollyS
These are real. I have forgotten the designer, but the boutique jewelry store, where my rings were purchased, has a display of them in both YG and WG. The owner always has one on. I think cost is around $2K.Date: 11/18/2007 3:10:14 AM
Author: LadyAmythyst69
Sarah was wearing a diamond encrusted ''key'' pendant that I haven''t seen before. Hard to tell if it is real or costume jewelry.
Yeah - I call it Brittney Spears syndrome!Date: 12/5/2007 7:13:21 PM
Author: HollyS
Something I''ve noticed about the young to middle-aged royal women of all the European families . . . they almost always look well put together and modest . . . without looking dowdy. They look like ladies, which, quite frankly, we average Americans have forgotten how to be. I mean, when you get a group of college girls invited to the White House, and they thought nothing of wearing flip-flops . . . well, that just says it all.
And you never see anything revealing in their wedding attire. I realize their churchs may require more traditional dress, but it''s always long sleeves and necklines without a hint of *the girls*. With the exception of Miss Bow Butt (I forgot her name!), they''ve been wearing lovely dresses for their weddings. A little modesty wouldn''t hurt the rest of us; I for one was rather shocked at what will pass for bridal attire in this day and age. I''ve seen underwear that covered more square inches than some of the (for instance) ''destination'' w-dresses being made!
I agree!!!Date: 12/5/2007 7:13:21 PM
Author: HollyS
Something I''ve noticed about the young to middle-aged royal women of all the European families . . . they almost always look well put together and modest . . . without looking dowdy. They look like ladies, which, quite frankly, we average Americans have forgotten how to be. I mean, when you get a group of college girls invited to the White House, and they thought nothing of wearing flip-flops . . . well, that just says it all.
And you never see anything revealing in their wedding attire. I realize their churchs may require more traditional dress, but it''s always long sleeves and necklines without a hint of *the girls*. With the exception of Miss Bow Butt (I forgot her name!), they''ve been wearing lovely dresses for their weddings. A little modesty wouldn''t hurt the rest of us; I for one was rather shocked at what will pass for bridal attire in this day and age. I''ve seen underwear that covered more square inches than some of the (for instance) ''destination'' w-dresses being made!