MamaBee
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2018
- Messages
- 14,585
Very pretty! I also love a smaller face. My wrist is 6.5..It gives me a good idea what the size would look like..
With or without diamonds @FL_runner?
Here are my 3 dressed watches, my hand is small however, chubby with fleshy fingers. I would wear 7.5in bracelets if I were to wear one on that hand.
First one is a Belmain, an impulse buy in Zurich when I was not having a good time on holiday with my then-hubby, and needed something to sweeten the stress (apologies for the fingerprints on the case), stainless steel Arabesque dial:
Next one I bought was a Ebel Beluga Manchette, MOP dial, 12 diamonds, this one I wear casually the most as it resembles a chunky bracelet:
Last one I bought was a full size Beluga, 27mm case, pink Starburst MOP dial, 12 diamonds, this one made it into the luxury watch thread that has a threshold of 2k USD and up:
All three together:
In case it is not apparently, I like shiny SS bracelets and not matt/satin ones, the same in other jewellery - got to be shiny and white metal.
One last photo, my day to day Fitbit Charge 2 with a chunky aftermarket SS bracelet (the bracelet is shiny/polished SS) for comparison!![]()
DK![]()
I may have to make a trip to the boutique..I don’t want to make a mistake..
Thank you for the photos on your wrist! That really helps! You have a wonderful collection!
I also prefer shiny..but I do like the matt too..
The Chopard Happy would make me crazy stressing out about the diamonds rattling in there chipping each other! Haha
My mom has worn once since 2005. She has changed the battery once. She bought hers new from Neiman Marcus. I have always admired it. I bought the same model she has from TRR in 2020 and I love it. Previously I had a Rolex (since 1979) and a Cartier Panthere YG no diamonds since 1987 and a WG no diamonds since 2002. I prefer the Chopard Happy Diamonds. The diamonds are in bezels and don’t chip.
Very pretty! I also love a smaller face. My wrist is 6.5..It gives me a good idea what the size would look like..
Oh! Your wrist is my size!
I dug up some photos that might help, though I suspect most of mine are larger than you will want (but you never know).
Ok, this is a 40 mm Submariner on the left, and a 37 mm Yachtmaster on the right.
Range of sizes here, and you can see that shape really does factor in.
From left to right:
—XL Cartier Tank Francaise, 36.5 mm x 28 mm (note the square shape somehow makes this look much smaller than the 36 mm watch to its right)
—Vintage Rolex Date, 36 mm
—Rolex Submariner, 40mm
—Rolex Datejust, discontinued size 26 mm.
L: my Grand Seiko SBGA 413 Spring.
R: A Grand Seiko birch I was trying at the boutique.
These watches are both 40 mm. However, the one on the right faces up much smaller, because it has a bezel around the sapphire crystal. The one on the left does not, and that makes it wear larger (optically, anyway).
Rolex Submariner, 40 mm. Contrast this 40 mm with….
Rolex Daytona, also 40 mm, but wears much, much smaller. Something to do with the curvature of the lugs, I think.
Also, if you ask me about my misadventures in jewelry/watches? THIS RIGHT HERE. Passing on this piece. Ugh.
Oh, one other thing about all these—look at these varying combos of dial color and watch hands and think about legibility. I have found that if the hands and the face are too close in color the watch is very difficult to read. My small Datejust was awful for legibility.
If I were to buy a watch today (I wouldn't as I no longer need one for time or status symbol) I'd just buy the cheapest Casio.
The hand lotion that has worked better (by far!) than any other for me is Neutrogena Norwegian formula hand cream. It is thick, so I like to put it on before bed.
I took off the Francaise..just to keep things accurate..I got it mixed up with the Tank Must with diamonds..It looks like it will be between a Tank and Ballon Bleu..![]()
Why choose? Get both if they suit!
DK![]()