- Joined
- Nov 1, 2007
- Messages
- 4,857
amethystguy|1316827989|3024321 said:Now here are the points of specific interest
Original flaw picture with arrows drawn in..this is the picture taken by Hugger after she recieved the stone back
Here is the ebay picture with arrows drawn to show where the software identified points of interest almost identical to the picture taken afterwards
You can see the arrows point out flaws detected by the computer from a pre-kelpie shot and a post kelpie shot.
Here is one where I layered both the pictures on top of each other...as you can see both areas pointed out by the arrows match up almost perfectly especially the top one. The bottom one does as well but it also happens to trend in the exact same direction...what are the chances that two completely different photos taken at two different times both before and after AGL and kelpie would show roughly the same type of mark?
In the layed pic you must account for slight differences in angle and distance but you can clearly see the same type of mark detected by the software.
My conclusion is the flaw was already there or was made larger by mis-handling and/or shipping. The flaw was there to begin with thats for sure...exactly how big and/or noticeable....well....
Impressive work!