MamaBee
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2018
- Messages
- 14,534
Oh I agree, @Daisys and Diamonds. I didn’t even see that. I love the ruby and Diamond band! Nice one, @MamaBee!
Thank you @Dmndsr4evr11!
Oh I agree, @Daisys and Diamonds. I didn’t even see that. I love the ruby and Diamond band! Nice one, @MamaBee!
@diamondseeker2006 - I agree. When I got the smaller band from WF a couple of years ago, I thought it would be bigger but too lazy to return it. IDJ will make a band with 24 stones 5 points each. I think that should be good. My bigger band has 11 point stones and I feel they’re a little too big. Maybe if I had a 3 ct stone like @MamaBee , the 11 points would look more proportional.
Thank you.
I may be the only weirdo in the group but it’s not even about less is more for me. It’s about proportion. I never like when either band sticks out on the side more than the other. Visually I guess it’s more about symmetry and balance. I just prefer things being flush and even. Obviously you can’t go wrong all of the rings are gorgeous and your hand can carry it off but if I’m being honest I prefer the smaller.
I prefer the thinner band with your engagement ring, it doesn’t try to steal attention from your beautiful stone. However, the thicker band would be great to wear on it’s own!
I love it with either band! May I ask the size of the e-ring?
I like your e-ring best with the smaller band, but this from someone whose favorite color is taupe. The big band is so spectacular! Have you tried wearing it with the new 3-stone OEC?
Thank you, @diamondyes. It’s 8.41mm. 2.237 carats ACA.
@Dmndsr4evr11, did you end up going with a band with the 5 point stones from IDJ? Would love to see it when you get it if so!
@Decision_Decisions- patiently waiting for it .