- Joined
- Jul 23, 2012
- Messages
- 20,155
Dancing Fire|1403880777|3702073 said:No, I only look at it for about a minute and I didn't look at it under different lighting nor did I use my I-scope. Here's what I do know...the stone should be .10mm wider in diameter...Niel|1403876984|3702032 said:Dancing Fire|1403876338|3702025 said:Well, I did say...the stone is a bit too deep...Tourmaline|1403867268|3701959 said:This is dangerous territory. You could create resentment that never goes away. Did you actually tell him that it was too steep? Or did you just want to do so?
I disagree.
I have a stone that deep and it's beautiful. Idealsopes to prove it. And it was exactly the same price as less deep stones in a smaller ct. So it could very well be this was the best in his budget. I just wonder if you hasn't seen the gia cert just how much would you be dogging this stone? Was it's visibly that terrible??
You wouldn't not be able to see that with the naked eye.
And from what I have found in personal experience that often times a .86 62.2 ct stone is often the same price as a 62.4 mm .9ct.
So does that really matter?
He very well could have weighed the pros and cobs and this was the best he found do. He might have found being able to say he hit the .9 ct mark was worth it when considering the mm and possibly the price was the same.
I'm just not sure I like that you make a post about how much of a dog your future SIL picked, but for all we know it could have a nice idealscope. I mean go look at HPD he picks lots of beautiful stones that don't have the best HCA