Cerulean
Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2019
- Messages
- 5,094
Sorry I can’t answer in depth atm, but the more tapered your baskets are, the smaller the gap will be.
Not to overwhelm you, but you’ll want to think about if the side stones are flush, or dropped at a lower height - here’s an example with side stones that are set lower than the center.
Do you have a profile picture of the hancocks ring you liked? Sorry if you shared and I got lost
MOCIUN on Instagram: "The new Helios Ring. Center 2.68 ct. U/VS2 King cut diamond flanked by two rose round cut yellow diamonds. A proprietary cut from the 1950s, the King cut has 86 facets, which affect the pattern of the reflections in a diamond ra
1,343 likes, 10 comments - mociun on November 23, 2019: "The new Helios Ring. Center 2.68 ct. U/VS2 King cut diamond flanked by two rose round cut yellow diamonds. A proprietary cut from the 1950s, the King cut has 86 facets, which affect the pattern of the reflections in a diamond rather than...www.instagram.com
As @Cerulean mentioned, the height of the sides is a pretty important factor. My personal preference is sides set a bit lower than the center with them angled/tucked in a bit.
I personally prefer some of the other ideas you have for the shank but if you really want the 2 rings to look like a “set” maybe you want the shank to mimic the design of your band? How wide is your band and what kind of melee does it have? You can still have the shank taper and thinner than your band but perhaps you want some similarly set melee on the shank.
Since you are committed to the smaller sides, I would not make the side stones too angled or you will visually reduce finger coverage.
I recently reset my engagement stone. The original design had the sides angled down and I didn’t love the finger coverage. I had my jeweler angle the side up slightly and I am really happy with the result.
PB on Instagram: "It’s time for Waxy Wednesday. Here’s the original wax versus the final version. The top version looked more tasteful to me but in the end Finger Coverage won #waxwednesday #ringmold #fingercoverage #ringgoals #shesaidyes #ringsetti
22 likes, 0 comments - bejewelledbliss on May 18, 2022: "It’s time for Waxy Wednesday. Here’s the original wax versus the final version. The top version looked more tasteful to me but in the end Finger Coverage won #waxwednesday #ringmold #fingercoverage #ringgoals #shesaidyes #ringsetting...www.instagram.com
Here’s a profile of the finished ring (just for the angles).
I think you have some wonderful ideas! This is just personal opinion, but I’m hesitant to have engraving anywhere that’s going to rub against another band for fear it would get messed up. Maybe it wouldn’t. But again, just an opinion.Ok I have some initial ideas, apologies in advance for my rubbish sketches! I’m not wedded to anything, so open to any and all feedback.
Idea 1 ~ Tri wire shank, one side plain, the other with motif, petal gallery
Inspo for motif as my sketch is not exactly the best!
Petal gallery inspo
Idea 2 ~ Engraved shank with plain sides
Engraving inspo
DK gallery inspo
I think you have some wonderful ideas! This is just personal opinion, but I’m hesitant to have engraving anywhere that’s going to rub against another band for fear it would get messed up. Maybe it wouldn’t. But again, just an opinion.
I like both! I’m a sucker for floral motifs but I like the simplicity of the filigree style in idea 2.
So from what I’ve read I don’t think tri wire will be an option? It’s sounds like it’s best for hand forged pieces? Also I’m assuming sizing would be an issue?
It looks the cleanest for hand forged, it’s doable with casting for sure. Not sure about sizing. I think some jewelers could do it, and some couldn’t
talk with I&R about resizing, figuring out a sizing bar if you’ve never had one is fussy. You’re talking about tiny increments of measurements. Whenever I’ve requested speed bumps, sizing bars or adding a little extra material inside to shave away..I’ve had jewelers discourage me as it may take a few tries to get it right so that it isn’t too tight / loose and I ended up not needing them anywaysThank you, good to know it’s doable with casting as I do like the look. Maybe it’s possible to have some kind of sizing bar at the back? Otherwise it may be easier to stick to a plain or engraved shank.
talk with I&R about resizing, figuring out a sizing bar if you’ve never had one is fussy. You’re talking about tiny increments of measurements. Whenever I’ve requested speed bumps, sizing bars or adding a little extra material inside to shave away..I’ve had jewelers discourage me as it may take a few tries to get it right so that it isn’t too tight / loose and I ended up not needing them anyways
in full transparency I’ve used their bench before and it’s pretty decent, but I’m not sure how advanced / complex they can get. Will be worth asking to see how they manage?
FWIW The separate settings they sell are not made by them - I believe they are manufactured in china.
And the difference between casting vs forging tri wire is that you lose the effect of 3 distinct wires being used in the shank, when they are cast it’s clearly one piece
Aah I think I’m using the wrong terminology, sorry. I know exactly what you mean and I’ve not had one of those before. What I’m thinking is to leaving a gap at the back of the shank that’s plain, some engraved bands have them, so that you have space to resize if needs be.
Like this
I’ll ask them if it’s possible and if they can show me examples of their tri wire if they’ve done it before. I’d rather play to their strengths so I know I’ll get a good outcome.
I didn’t realise they outsourced their other settings. Good to know their bench is decent, this is what I’m thinking design wise.
Would you consider double milgraining just the center stone? I think that may be a pretty look and visually make the center look a bit bigger.
Here is @sweetpea&babycorn ’s amazing OMC that is double milgrained.
Very pretty!
To be honest, I think the sizing bar is going to look strange because it’s going to really interrupt the flow of the shank (the “bar” part is going to be a different height at the edges) but that’s just me. I guess you can always see how CADs look. I was not of a the understanding that a cast tri wire shank is impossible to resize.
Thank you for thinking of my ring! To be perfectly honest I don’t love the double milgrain for my center stone and it wasn’t part of the original CADs. However I trusted DK’s judgment when he said he doubled it to protect the girdle and to keep the fineness of the milgrain, otherwise the milgraining would be far larger than either of us preferred. Anyway, I love the way your ring design has come along and can’t wait to see the final product!
Ha ha go ahead! Ok so the bigger side stones were $648 more than the smaller ones. Total cost with the smaller size side diamonds and centre was $5760 (the sides were $810). They have estimated the setting in platinum will be $1600-1800.
Delayed reply since I fell off the grid but thank you for the information especially as a lot of our wants and budget are similar!
I'm tracking along this journey and excited to see how much progress you've made!
No worries! I can’t help overthink a bit though, should I have waited to see what else comes along or just go for it? I just hope I don’t see anything else that’s tempting!
I did have a bit of a mad moment yesterday and saw a 1.8 with I&R that I nearly messaged them about, but then talked myself down especially as it’s lower in colour and nearly double the price of my existing centre!!!!!
If you are still feeling uncertain there’s not reason to push yourself to make a purchase now!
Although some amount of nervousness I think is always there.
No worries! I can’t help overthink a bit though, should I have waited to see what else comes along or just go for it? I just hope I don’t see anything else that’s tempting!
I did have a bit of a mad moment yesterday and saw a 1.8 with I&R that I nearly messaged them about, but then talked myself down especially as it’s lower in colour and nearly double the price of my existing centre!!!!!
I feel like we are similar in many ways it’s hard for us to get away from the “what if”. Personally I think you did an amazing job with your stone selection and also staying within budget but of course you need to also believe that for yourself.
If you’re REALLY wavering, would your deposit be able to go to another stone in their inventory? Just laying out options since I don’t think there is anything wrong at all with what you’ve already picked out.
I’m looking at two diamonds next week too, there is about a $2k different between the two… I basically shouldn’t even be looking at the higher priced one but I just need to satisfy my “what if” itch. I’m also wondering if I need to take a step back from the project for a bit to kind of sort through what my real budget is etc.
I think for many of us here on PS, “forever” (in terms of jewelry) is loosely translated to “for now”. That doesn’t mean you won’t absolutely love it. You’ve put so much of yourself into this project that I honestly think you will. But you’ve learned a ton, too and with that comes the thirst for more of the excitement and challenge of the next project or hunt.
This ring will be one you will love forever because it will be so personal to you. But will it always be the one on your left ring finger? Only time will tell. It could be or it could be worn on your right hand or alternated out as your mood dictates.
For years I had one ring that represented being “taken”. Now (after finding PS), I have five that I am likely to rotate. It’s not that I don’t love my original, or even my first upgrade. It’s that I love being able to customize my ring finger and enjoy all the pretty things and express my personality through that.
I hope that makes sense.