- Joined
- Jun 8, 2008
- Messages
- 55,482
I find this odd too. I would want the guy to understand that I had a vested interest in the relationship and wasnt just using them
for a free meal. Its odd that we all think so differently on the subject.
I find this very interesting. I never knew any girl/woman who used a man for a free meal. I don't think any of us were ever that desperate and in addition, I never dated a boy/man who wasn't intelligent enough to realize the difference b/w a girl/woman who genuinely wanted to get to know him vs one who just wanted a meal ticket.
I think the differences b/w our responses is varied because we come from diverse background with different experiences. There is no one right or wrong way here. There is only a right or wrong way for each couple and that's the beauty of it.
I was raised knowing chivalry (pulling out chairs, opening doors etc) was important and in general, the man paid for the dates with the exception of when you were taking him out. Of course I could open my own doors and pay for my own dates. I owned my apt in full when I met my dh and I also owned my car and took fabulous vacations. It was obvious I wasn't using him for the food/entertainment etc. We just enjoyed the traditional dating roles while still both of us being very independent individuals. I know to some it might seem a dichotomy but it was not for us. I also expected the man to see me home whether it be via car/taxi or subway or walking. It was just the right thing to do (for me).
I also did date poor college students and men who didn't make much money at all and guess what? We still had great dates. Home cooked meals (by the men as I cannot cook a lick ), long walks, bike rides, etc. There is so much to do that doesn't cost much in NYC that it was just never an issue. It was always about the person whose company I enjoyed rather than what we were actually doing on the date.