Ellen
Super_Ideal_Rock
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2006
- Messages
- 24,433
I meant that it's right at the limit of what is considered a FIC. I don't have the stats here at work, but I vaguely remember the crown angle is 35.5 and...gah, I can't remember the pavilion angle! Anyway, it's very firey even on the borderline.Date: 2/18/2007 6:50:07 PM
Author: Stone Hunter
WOW
Nice photos everyone.
Gothgrrl, Flygirl, Tina, Cehra, and EbonyK you really have alot of colors coming off of your stones. Some really cool shots.
EbonyK what do you mean by saying your stone is borderline?
Thanks. "Borderline" means "not so good" to me so it was confusing since your stone looks very good.Date: 2/19/2007 10:21:40 AM
Author: ebonykawai
I meant that it''s right at the limit of what is considered a FIC. I don''t have the stats here at work, but I vaguely remember the crown angle is 35.5 and...gah, I can''t remember the pavilion angle! Anyway, it''s very firey even on the borderline.Date: 2/18/2007 6:50:07 PM
Author: Stone Hunter
WOW
Nice photos everyone.
Gothgrrl, Flygirl, Tina, Cehra, and EbonyK you really have alot of colors coming off of your stones. Some really cool shots.
EbonyK what do you mean by saying your stone is borderline?
I think that should be "a CARROT" a dayDate: 2/23/2007 2:00:46 PM
Author: canuk-gal
an apple a day........
I don't want to take this too off topic, but since this is the fire thread and we all want to capture the fire off our stones...Date: 2/23/2007 3:56:12 PM
Author: canuk-gal
HI:
Thanks gals! I wish I had others picture taking skills, what I see cannot capture on camera: case in point, picture 2 would appear to have very little 'fire', yet it exploded with color when I was setting up for the shot as partially seen in the reflection........
cheers--Sharon
I have also experienced this, but I''ve found if you take a pic, even though it''s not in focus (because when it is, yes it tries to cut down on glare) you can still get the bigger fire shots, kinda tricking the camera. They won''t always be in focus, but I''ve found they come out really good more times than not. Also, the camera sees things with one "eye", while we have two, so we naturally see more. That''s the watered down version, there are some higher tech answers if you go back through the thread.Date: 2/23/2007 5:16:41 PM
Author: SuzyQZ
I don''t want to take this too off topic, but since this is the fire thread and we all want to capture the fire off our stones...Date: 2/23/2007 3:56:12 PM
Author: canuk-gal
HI:
Thanks gals! I wish I had others picture taking skills, what I see cannot capture on camera: case in point, picture 2 would appear to have very little ''fire'', yet it exploded with color when I was setting up for the shot as partially seen in the reflection........
cheers--Sharon
I''ve noticed the same problem as Canuk-gal with my digital camera. I think there must be some kind of built-in glare eliminator or polarization in the lens that takes away the glare, flashes and other color bursts so that your photo will be clear. I could see lots of flashes of color from my diamonds, but could never capture them on my digital camera.
Any camera experts out there that can chime in? I always wondered why I couldn''t capture what my eye was seeing. Is it a problem for digital cameras only or are regular 35mm film cameras affected as well?